Literature DB >> 26475659

The Era of Shock Wave Lithotripsy is Over: No.

James E Lingeman1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26475659      PMCID： PMC4845729          DOI： 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN： 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera.

Authors:  Christian Bohris; Alexander Roosen; Martin Dickmann; Yasmin Hocaoglu; Stefan Sandner; Markus Bader; Christian G Stief; Sebastian Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Fred T Lee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kaiwen Li; Tianxin Lin; Caixia Zhang; Xinxiang Fan; Kewei Xu; Liangkuan Bi; Jinli Han; Hai Huang; Hao Liu; Wen Dong; Yu Duan; Min Yu; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Triple D Score is a reportable predictor of shockwave lithotripsy stone-free rates.

Authors:  Timothy Y Tran; Kathryn McGillen; Eugene Blanchard Cone; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Naeem Bhojani; Jessica A Mandeville; Tariq A Hameed; Trevor M Soergel; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Amy E Krambeck; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.