Literature DB >> 26475525

Multiple Weak Linear Motifs Enhance Recruitment and Processivity in SPOP-Mediated Substrate Ubiquitination.

Wendy K Pierce1, Christy R Grace1, Jihun Lee1, Amanda Nourse2, Melissa R Marzahn1, Edmond R Watson3, Anthony A High4, Junmin Peng5, Brenda A Schulman6, Tanja Mittag7.   

Abstract

Primary sequence motifs, with millimolar affinities for binding partners, are abundant in disordered protein regions. In multivalent interactions, such weak linear motifs can cooperate to recruit binding partners via avidity effects. If linear motifs recruit modifying enzymes, optimal placement of weak motifs may regulate access to modification sites. Weak motifs may thus exert physiological relevance stronger than that suggested by their affinities, but molecular mechanisms of their function are still poorly understood. Herein, we use the N-terminal disordered region of the Hedgehog transcriptional regulator Gli3 (Gli3(1-90)) to determine the role of weak motifs encoded in its primary sequence for the recruitment of its ubiquitin ligase CRL3(SPOP) and the subsequent effect on ubiquitination efficiency. The substrate adaptor SPOP binds linear motifs through its MATH (meprin and TRAF homology) domain and forms higher-order oligomers through its oligomerization domains, rendering SPOP multivalent for its substrates. Gli3 has multiple weak SPOP binding motifs. We map three such motifs in Gli3(1-90), the weakest of which has a millimolar dissociation constant. Multivalency of ligase and substrate for each other facilitates enhanced ligase recruitment and stimulates Gli3(1-90) ubiquitination in in vitro ubiquitination assays. We speculate that the weak motifs enable processivity through avidity effects and by providing steric access to lysine residues that are otherwise not prioritized for polyubiquitination. Weak motifs may generally be employed in multivalent systems to act as gatekeepers regulating post-translational modification.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR spectroscopy; Speckle-type POZ protein; cancer; degron; multivalency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475525      PMCID: PMC4826287          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  78 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for elucidation of structure and dynamics in disordered states.

Authors:  H J Dyson; P E Wright
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles.

Authors:  Tanja Mittag; Julie D Forman-Kay
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  Polybivalency and disordered proteins in ordering macromolecular assemblies.

Authors:  Elisar Barbar; Afua Nyarko
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Structure of a beta-TrCP1-Skp1-beta-catenin complex: destruction motif binding and lysine specificity of the SCF(beta-TrCP1) ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Geng Wu; Guozhou Xu; Brenda A Schulman; Philip D Jeffrey; J Wade Harper; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  BTB domain-containing speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) serves as an adaptor of Daxx for ubiquitination by Cul3-based ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Jeong Eun Kwon; Muhnho La; Kyu Hee Oh; Young Mi Oh; Gi Ryang Kim; Jae Hong Seol; Sung Hee Baek; Tomoki Chiba; Keiji Tanaka; Ok Sun Bang; Cheol O Joe; Chin Ha Chung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6.

Authors:  Qian Yin; Su-Chang Lin; Betty Lamothe; Miao Lu; Yu-Chih Lo; Gregory Hura; Lixin Zheng; Rebecca L Rich; Alejandro D Campos; David G Myszka; Michael J Lenardo; Bryant G Darnay; Hao Wu
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Identification of conjugation specificity determinants unmasks vestigial preference for ubiquitin within the NEDD8 E2.

Authors:  Danny T Huang; Min Zhuang; Olivier Ayrault; Brenda A Schulman
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  David Eliezer
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Fbw7 dimerization determines the specificity and robustness of substrate degradation.

Authors:  Markus Welcker; Elizabeth A Larimore; Jherek Swanger; Maria T Bengoechea-Alonso; Jonathan E Grim; Johan Ericsson; Ning Zheng; Bruce E Clurman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  23 in total

1.  Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation.

Authors:  Robert McCoy Vernon; Paul Andrew Chong; Brian Tsang; Tae Hun Kim; Alaji Bah; Patrick Farber; Hong Lin; Julie Deborah Forman-Kay
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  SPOP Mutation Drives Prostate Tumorigenesis In Vivo through Coordinate Regulation of PI3K/mTOR and AR Signaling.

Authors:  Mirjam Blattner; Deli Liu; Brian D Robinson; Dennis Huang; Anton Poliakov; Dong Gao; Srilakshmi Nataraj; Lesa D Deonarine; Michael A Augello; Verena Sailer; Lalit Ponnala; Michael Ittmann; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Andrea Sboner; Yu Chen; Mark A Rubin; Christopher E Barbieri
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Spop promotes skeletal development and homeostasis by positively regulating Ihh signaling.

Authors:  Hongchen Cai; Aimin Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  SPOP and cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison Clark; Marieke Burleson
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 5.  The ubiquitin ligase adaptor SPOP in cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Cuneo; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 6.  The Genomics of Prostate Cancer: A Historic Perspective.

Authors:  Mark A Rubin; Francesca Demichelis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Multiple Modes of Protein-Protein Interactions Promote RNP Granule Assembly.

Authors:  Tanja Mittag; Roy Parker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  ATM-phosphorylated SPOP contributes to 53BP1 exclusion from chromatin during DNA replication.

Authors:  Dejie Wang; Jian Ma; Maria Victoria Botuyan; Gaofeng Cui; Yuqian Yan; Donglin Ding; Yingke Zhou; Eugene W Krueger; Jiang Pei; Xiaosheng Wu; Liguo Wang; Huadong Pei; Mark A McNiven; Dingwei Ye; Georges Mer; Haojie Huang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Cancer Mutations of the Tumor Suppressor SPOP Disrupt the Formation of Active, Phase-Separated Compartments.

Authors:  Jill J Bouchard; Joel H Otero; Daniel C Scott; Elzbieta Szulc; Erik W Martin; Nafiseh Sabri; Daniele Granata; Melissa R Marzahn; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Xavier Salvatella; Brenda A Schulman; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 19.328

10.  Higher-order oligomerization promotes localization of SPOP to liquid nuclear speckles.

Authors:  Melissa R Marzahn; Suresh Marada; Jihun Lee; Amanda Nourse; Sophia Kenrick; Huaying Zhao; Gili Ben-Nissan; Regina-Maria Kolaitis; Jennifer L Peters; Stanley Pounds; Wesley J Errington; Gilbert G Privé; J Paul Taylor; Michal Sharon; Peter Schuck; Stacey K Ogden; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.