Chu Matsuda1, Michitaka Honda2, Chihiro Tanaka3, Mutsumi Fukunaga4, Keiichiro Ishibashi5, Yoshinori Munemoto6, Taishi Hata7, Hiroyuki Bando8, Mitsuru Oshiro9, Michiya Kobayashi10, Yukihiko Tokunaga11, Akitomo Fujii12, Naoki Nagata13, Koji Oba14, Hideyuki Mishima15. 1. Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-10-6 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. michitaka.honda@jfcr.or.jp. 3. Department of Surgery, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan. 4. Department of Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan. 5. Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan. 6. Department of Surgery, Fukui Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan. 7. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. 8. Department of Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan. 9. Department of Surgery, Toho University, Sakura Hospital, Sakura, Japan. 10. Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan. 11. Department of Surgery, Japan Post Kyoto Teishin Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 12. Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. 13. Kitakyushu General Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan. 14. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 15. Clinical Cancer Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a dose-dense capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for whom reintroduction ofoxaliplatin had been planned as a third- or later-line regimen. METHODS: The patients with mCRC who had received priorchemotherapy including oxaliplatin and were scheduled for reintroduction of oxaliplatin were randomized to capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 21 days (Q3W group) or capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2)) twice daily on days 1-7 and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 14 days (Q2W group). The primary endpoint was the time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and other adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the trial-22 patients were randomly assigned to the Q3W group and 23 to the Q2W group. The median TTF was 3.4 months in both groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.053; p = 0.880). The median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 9.2 months in the Q2W group and 4.3 and 12.1 months in the Q3W group, respectively (HR 1.15; p = 0.153 and 0.672; p = 0.836). The most common grade 3-4 AEs in the Q3W and Q2W groups were fatigue (27.3 vs 21.7), neuropathy (9.1 vs 0 %) and diarrhea (9.1 vs 0 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant inter-group difference in any of the efficacy and safety endpoints, including TTF, OS, RFS and AEs. The results of this clinical trial were convincingly negative.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a dose-dense capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for whom reintroduction of oxaliplatin had been planned as a third- or later-line regimen. METHODS: The patients with mCRC who had received prior chemotherapy including oxaliplatin and were scheduled for reintroduction of oxaliplatin were randomized to capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 21 days (Q3W group) or capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2)) twice daily on days 1-7 and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 14 days (Q2W group). The primary endpoint was the time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and other adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the trial-22 patients were randomly assigned to the Q3W group and 23 to the Q2W group. The median TTF was 3.4 months in both groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.053; p = 0.880). The median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 9.2 months in the Q2W group and 4.3 and 12.1 months in the Q3W group, respectively (HR 1.15; p = 0.153 and 0.672; p = 0.836). The most common grade 3-4 AEs in the Q3W and Q2W groups were fatigue (27.3 vs 21.7), neuropathy (9.1 vs 0 %) and diarrhea (9.1 vs 0 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant inter-group difference in any of the efficacy and safety endpoints, including TTF, OS, RFS and AEs. The results of this clinical trial were convincingly negative.
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Edith P Mitchell; Thomas Cartwright; Ambrose Kwok; Sylvia Hu; Edward McKenna; Yehuda Z Patt Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-05-23
Authors: Carlos Grande; Guillermo Quintero; Sonia Candamio; Lorena París Bouzas; María José Villanueva; Begoña Campos; Elena Gallardo; Elena Alvarez; Joaquín Casal; José Ramón Mel Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Emily Chan; Yi-Jen Chen; Harry S Cooper; Paul F Engstrom; Peter C Enzinger; Moon J Fenton; Charles S Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Wells Messersmith; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Eric Rohren; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Kristina M Gregory; Deborah A Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Kakolyris; J Souglakos; A Polyzos; A Ardavanis; N Ziras; A Athanasiadis; I Varthalitis; K Amarantidis; S Tsousis; L Vamvakas; N Vardakis; V Georgoulias Journal: Oncology Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: J Cassidy; S Clarke; E Díaz-Rubio; W Scheithauer; A Figer; R Wong; S Koski; K Rittweger; F Gilberg; L Saltz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640