Gemma Eminowicz1, Mary McCormack2. 1. University College Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: gemmaeminowicz@nhs.net. 2. University College Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Accurate target volume delineation is essential for radiotherapy delivery, yet significant intra and inter-observer variability is documented. We analysed the variation in cervical cancer clinical target volume (CTV) delineation. MATERIALS/ METHODS: All INTERLACE participating centres completed two RTQA outlining exercises. The Trial Management Group created a consensus outline. A separate STAPLE algorithm outline was created. Using these two outlines an optimised gold standard was generated. Volume, maximum distance from DICOM centre in all directions, and Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) were calculated and compared for each centres' outlines. Anatomical areas included within CTV were recorded to detect systematic differences. RESULTS: 21 outlines were compared for case 1 and 22 for case 2. Volume ranged from 340 cc to 676 cc (case 1) and from 458 cc to 806 cc (case 2). A maximum 4 cm difference between outlines was observed in one direction. JCI ranged from 0.51 to 0.81 (case 1) and 0.57 to 0.81 (case 2). Variation in anatomical areas included in CTV exists between the two cases and between centres. CONCLUSIONS: Significant inter-observer variation in cervical cancer delineation has been demonstrated. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure inter-observer consistency through education, guidelines and multi-centre collaboration.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Accurate target volume delineation is essential for radiotherapy delivery, yet significant intra and inter-observer variability is documented. We analysed the variation in cervical cancer clinical target volume (CTV) delineation. MATERIALS/ METHODS: All INTERLACE participating centres completed two RTQA outlining exercises. The Trial Management Group created a consensus outline. A separate STAPLE algorithm outline was created. Using these two outlines an optimised gold standard was generated. Volume, maximum distance from DICOM centre in all directions, and Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) were calculated and compared for each centres' outlines. Anatomical areas included within CTV were recorded to detect systematic differences. RESULTS: 21 outlines were compared for case 1 and 22 for case 2. Volume ranged from 340 cc to 676 cc (case 1) and from 458 cc to 806 cc (case 2). A maximum 4 cm difference between outlines was observed in one direction. JCI ranged from 0.51 to 0.81 (case 1) and 0.57 to 0.81 (case 2). Variation in anatomical areas included in CTV exists between the two cases and between centres. CONCLUSIONS: Significant inter-observer variation in cervical cancer delineation has been demonstrated. Ongoing efforts are needed to ensure inter-observer consistency through education, guidelines and multi-centre collaboration.
Authors: André Toussaint; Anne Richter; Frederick Mantel; John C Flickinger; Inga Siiner Grills; Neelam Tyagi; Arjun Sahgal; Daniel Letourneau; Jason P Sheehan; David J Schlesinger; Peter Carlos Gerszten; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Eva Versteijne; Eelco Lens; Astrid van der Horst; Arjan Bel; Jorrit Visser; Cornelis J A Punt; Mustafa Suker; Casper H J van Eijck; Geertjan van Tienhoven Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Ji Hyeon Joo; Young Seok Kim; Byung Chul Cho; Chi Young Jeong; Won Park; Hak Jae Kim; Won Sup Yoon; Mee Sun Yoon; Ji-Yoon Kim; Jin Hwa Choi; Youngmin Choi; Joo-Young Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard Pötter; Kari Tanderup; Christian Kirisits; Astrid de Leeuw; Kathrin Kirchheiner; Remi Nout; Li Tee Tan; Christine Haie-Meder; Umesh Mahantshetty; Barbara Segedin; Peter Hoskin; Kjersti Bruheim; Bhavana Rai; Fleur Huang; Erik Van Limbergen; Max Schmid; Nicole Nesvacil; Alina Sturdza; Lars Fokdal; Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen; Dietmar Georg; Marianne Assenholt; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Christel Nomden; Israel Fortin; Supriya Chopra; Uulke van der Heide; Tamara Rumpold; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-01-11