Literature DB >> 26475076

Comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Önder Ercan1, Alev Özer2, Bülent Köstü1, Murat Bakacak1, Gürkan Kıran1, Fazıl Avcı3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare vaginal length and sexual function after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), and vaginal hysterectomy (VH).
METHODS: The present cross-sectional study at a single center in Turkey compared vaginal length and sexual function among women who received TLH, TAH, VH, or no surgery (groups 1, 2, 3, and 0, respectively) between January 2011 and April 2014. All women underwent hysterectomy for benign reasons at least 3months before the study and were sexually active. Vaginal length was measured between the hymenal ring and vaginal apex. Sexual function was assessed via the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, short form (PISQ-12).
RESULTS: Vaginal length in groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 was 10.9±1.5, 8.9±1.4, 8.5±1.2, and 8.1±0.7cm, respectively; it was significantly longer in the control group (P<0.001), and significantly shorter in group 3 than in group 1 (P=0.03). The mean PISQ-12 score in groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 was 18.6±5.2, 12.9±3.0, 13.8±4.4, and 11.5±4.4, respectively, and was significantly higher in group 0 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Total hysterectomy shortened vaginal length and compromised sexual function regardless of the technique used.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; PISQ-12 score; Vaginal length

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475076     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  6 in total

1.  Relationship of postoperative vaginal anatomy and sexual function: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shunaha Kim-Fine; Danielle D Antosh; Ethan M Balk; Kate V Meriwether; Gregg Kanter; Alexis A Dieter; Mamta M Mamik; Meadow Good; Ruchira Singh; Alexandriah Alas; Mohamed Foda; David D Rahn; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The influence of conventional and extended supracervical hysterectomy on sexuality and quality of life parameters: a prospective bi-center study with a special focus on postoperative spotting.

Authors:  C Spüntrup; M Banerjee; M Bordelius; M Hellmich; J Bojahr; B Bojahr; C Albus; G Noé
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Recovery time period and quality of life after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Raden Khairiyatul Afiyah; Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni; Budi Prasetyo; Didik Dwi Winarno
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Sexual function after total laparoscopic hysterectomy or transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disorders: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Xiaoyan Ying
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Georgios Gitas; I Alkatout; L Proppe; L Hanker; L Allahqoli; G Grimbizis; A Rody; N Werner; S Sommer; S Baum
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Authors:  Hongying He; Zhijun Yang; Dingyuan Zeng; Jiangtao Fan; Xiaoxia Hu; Yuan Ye; Hua Bai; Yanming Jiang; Zhong Lin; Zhiying Lei; Xinlin Li; Lian Li; Jinghua Gan; Ying Lan; Xiongzhi Tang; Danxia Wang; Junsong Jiang; Xiaoyan Wu; Meiying Li; Xiaoqing Ren; Xiaomin Yang; Mei Liu; Qinmei Wang; Fuyan Jiang; Li Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.