Literature DB >> 26475071

Inclusion of phytogenic blends in different nutrient density diets of meat-type ducks.

Mohsen Mohammadi Gheisar1, Yong Woon Im2, Hae Hyoung Lee2, Yang Il Choi3, In Ho Kim4.   

Abstract

A total of 160 1-day-old ducklings (average initial body weight of 53 g), were used in a 42-d feeding trial to evaluate the effects of reducing nutrient density of diets, and supplementing the diets with a phytogenic blend (quillaja, anise, and thyme) on their growth, carcass quality, and nutrient digestibility. After checking body weight on d 1, the birds were sorted into pens with 5 birds/pen and 8 pens/treatment. The treatments were: T1, Basal diet; T2, T1+150 ppm phytogenic blend; T3, T1-(1% CP, 0.04% Lys, 0.05% Met+Cys, 0.02% Ca, and 0.02% P, and 50 kcal ME); T4, T3+150 ppm phytogenic blend. The results indicated that reducing nutrient density of the diets had an adverse effect (P<0.05) on body weight gain (BWG) on d 1 to 21, d 21 to 42, and the overall experimental period. Supplementing the diets with the phytogenic blend improved (P<0.05) BWG and feed conversion ratio (FCR) on d 21 to 42 and the overall experimental period. Feed intake was not affected by treatments. Low nutrient density diets increased (P<0.05) the cooking loss percentage of breast meat. Supplementing the diets with the phytogenic blend decreased (P<0.05) the lightness of breast meat. The percentage of drip loss was influenced (P<0.05) by nutrient density and the phytogenic blend on d 1 and d 7. The relative weights of breast meat, abdominal fat, gizzard, liver, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius, pH, and TBARS values were not affected by the treatments. The digestibility of dry matter, energy, nitrogen, ADF, and NDF was decreased (P<0.05) by reducing nutrients density of the diets, but addition of the phytogenic blend alleviated (P<0.05) the negative effects of lowering the nutrient density. The results indicated that the ducks fed high nutrient density diets supplemented with the phytogenic blend showed higher BWG and nutrient digestibility and lower FCR, cooking loss, drip loss, and TBARS value, without any negative effect on meat quality and relative organs weights.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duck; TBARS value; growth performance; nutrient digestibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475071     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  2 in total

1.  Calcium supplementation in low nutrient density diet for meat ducks improves breast meat tenderness associated with myocyte apoptosis and proteolytic changes.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhang; Quifeng Zeng; Shiping Bai; Jianping Wang; Xuemei Ding; Yue Xuan; Zhuowei Su; Joris Michiels; Keying Zhang
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 2.  Phytogenic Feed Additives in Poultry: Achievements, Prospective and Challenges.

Authors:  Nedra Abdelli; David Solà-Oriol; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.