| Literature DB >> 26475066 |
Yuvnik Trada1, Andrew Kneebone2, Andrea Paneghel3, Maria Pearse4, Mark Sidhom5, Colin Tang6, Kirsty Wiltshire3, Annette Haworth3, Carol Fraser-Browne4, Jarad Martin7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore site- and clinician-level factors associated with protocol violations requiring real-time-review (RTR) resubmission in a multicenter clinical trial to help tailor future quality assurance (QA) protocols. METHODS AND MATERIALS: RAVES (Radiation Therapy-Adjuvant vs Early Salvage) (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 08.03) is a randomized trial comparing adjuvant with early salvage radiation therapy in men with positive surgical margins or pT3 disease after prostatectomy. Quality assurance in RAVES required each clinician and site to submit a credentialing dummy run (DR) and for each patient's radiation therapy plan to undergo external RTR before treatment. Prospectively defined major violations from trial protocol required remedy and resubmission. Site and clinician factors associated with RTR resubmission were examined using hierarchical modeling.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26475066 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ISSN: 0360-3016 Impact factor: 7.038