Literature DB >> 26474477

Virtual Visits: Managing prenatal care with modern technology.

Bethann M Pflugeisen1, Christi McCarren, Stephen Poore, Malinda Carlile, Richard Schroeder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To implement and evaluate a novel model of prenatal care for low-risk pregnant women that intersperses in-person physician visits with nurse practitioner visits conducted via videoconference.
METHODS: This Quality Improvement initiative gave low-risk pregnant women the option of enrolling in a Traditional (N = 941) or Virtual Visit (N = 117) track for their prenatal care. Traditional patients had 14 physician visits and a postpartum visit. Virtual Visit patients had nine physician visits, five prenatal videoconference visits, and a 2-week postpartum videoconference visit. Measured outcomes include demographic variables, pregnancy and birth outcomes, and use of the health system. Logistic regression was used to assess demographic factors affecting track enrollment decisions. Multivariate logistic regression and ANCOVA methods were used to evaluate pregnancy and birth outcomes, adjusting for relevant confounding variables.
RESULTS: Women enrolling in the Virtual Visit track were twice as likely to be partnered (p = 0.03) and not enrolled in government supplemental nutrition assistance (p = 0.01). They were seven times as likely to have been pregnant at least once before this enrollment (p < 0.001). Although a significantly higher percentage of Virtual Visit patients had a preeclampsia diagnosis (p = 0.02, N = 10 Virtual Visit patients), no other differences were observed between the groups in pregnancy/birth outcomes or health system use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Virtual Visit program provides low-risk pregnant women with a new model of prenatal care that does not appear to demonstrate increased risk for mother or baby compared to a traditional model. This program may be especially appealing to middle-/high-income mothers who are partnered and already have children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26474477     DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  12 in total

1.  Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care.

Authors:  Bethann Mangel Pflugeisen; Jin Mou
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-07

2.  A Group Videoconference Intervention for Reducing Perinatal Depressive Symptoms: A Telehealth Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gwen Latendresse; ElLois Bailey; Eli Iacob; Hannah Murphy; Ryoko Pentecost; Nancy Thompson; Carol Hogue
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Optimizing mother-baby wellness during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic: A case for telemedicine.

Authors:  Metabel Markwei; Oluwatosin Goje
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 4.  eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  Josephus Fm van den Heuvel; T Katrien Groenhof; Jan Hw Veerbeek; Wouter W van Solinge; A Titia Lely; Arie Franx; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A double-edged sword-telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed-methods study of healthcare providers.

Authors:  Anna Galle; Aline Semaan; Elise Huysmans; Constance Audet; Anteneh Asefa; Therese Delvaux; Bosede Bukola Afolabi; Alison Marie El Ayadi; Lenka Benova
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-02

6.  Telemedicine for contraceptive counseling: Patient experiences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.

Authors:  Bianca M Stifani; Abigail Smith; Karina Avila; Elise W Boos; June Ng; Erika E Levi; Nerys C Benfield
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Experiences of Dutch maternity care professionals during the first wave of COVID-19 in a community based maternity care system.

Authors:  Eline L M van Manen; Martine Hollander; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Ank de Jonge; Corine Verhoeven; Janneke Gitsels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Aleha Aziz; Noelia Zork; Janice J Aubey; Caitlin D Baptiste; Mary E D'Alton; Ukachi N Emeruwa; Karin M Fuchs; Dena Goffman; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Jennifer H Haythe; Anita P LaSala; Nigel Madden; Eliza C Miller; Russell S Miller; Catherine Monk; Leslie Moroz; Samsiya Ona; Laurence E Ring; Jean-Ju Sheen; Erica S Spiegel; Lynn L Simpson; Hope S Yates; Alexander M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Use of telemedicine in obstetrics and gynaecology in Zimbabwe during a lockdown period.

Authors:  Jephat Moyo; Gerald Madziyire
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-06-24

10.  Obstetrical Telehealth and Virtual Care Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Adina R Kern-Goldberger; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.