Literature DB >> 26474358

A randomized open label study of 'imipenem vs. cefepime' in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Ankur Jindal1, Manoj Kumar1, Ajeet S Bhadoria2, Rakhi Maiwall1, Shiv K Sarin1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), in the presence of bacterial resistance or failure of third generation cephalosporins (3rd GC) has poor outcome. Empirical antibiotic(s) options are limited in these scenarios.
METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotics with SBP because of hospital acquired SBP (>48 h of admission), microbial resistance or non-response (no resolution of SBP at 48 h) were randomized to Cefepime (n = 88) or Imipenem (n = 87) plus standard medical therapy. We assessed for 'response at 48 h' (reduction in ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil count (ANC) by >25% at 48 h), resolution of SBP (<250 cu/mm ANC at day 5) and their clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Of 957 paracentesis in 1200 hospitalized cirrhotics, 253 (26.4%) had SBP and 175 (69.6%) were randomized. Baseline parameters were comparable in two groups. Response at 48 h (58.6% vs. 51.7%; P = 0.4) and resolution of SBP in those with response at 48 h were comparable with no difference in mortality at week 2, month 1 and 3. Patients with 'No response at 48 h' had higher mortality compared with responders (73.8% vs. 25%; P < 0.001). Resolution of SBP was associated with 'response at 48 h' and septic shock, latter being main pre-terminal event. AKI at enrolment [Hazard ratio (HR), 2.6], pneumonia [HR, 2.9], septic shock [HR, 2.2] and response at 48 h [HR, 4.6] predicted poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized cirrhotics with SBP and risk factors for treatment failure, cefepime showed comparable efficacy and survival to imipenem. Non-response to therapy at 48 h is a reliable predictor of treatment failure and mortality. Antibiotic combinations and novel options are needed for these patients.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute kidney injury; ascites; cirrhosis; hepatic encephalopathy; liver transplantation; multidrug resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26474358     DOI: 10.1111/liv.12985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  4 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous bacterial and fungal peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis: A literature review.

Authors:  Toru Shizuma
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-27

2.  Initial choice of antibiotic in recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Gayathri Vasanthakumari Sasidharan Nair; Prannoy George Mathen; M Gopalakrishna Pillai; K P Gireesh Kumar; K K Velayudhan; T P Sreekrishnan
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2019-12-11

3.  Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Iogna Prat; Peter Wilson; Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper; Davide Roccarina; Amine Benmassaoud; Maria Corina Plaz Torres; Neil Hawkins; Maxine Cowlin; Elisabeth Jane Milne; Douglas Thorburn; Chavdar S Pavlov; Brian R Davidson; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-16

Review 4.  Spontaneous fungal peritonitis: Epidemiology, current evidence and future prospective.

Authors:  Marco Fiore; Sebastiano Leone
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.