Literature DB >> 26474333

Effect of Environment and Sugar Beet Genotype on Root Rot Development and Pathogen Profile During Storage.

Sebastian Liebe1, Mark Varrelmann1.   

Abstract

Storage rots represent an economically important factor impairing the storability of sugar beet by increasing sucrose losses and invert sugar content. Understanding the development of disease management strategies, knowledge about major storage pathogens, and factors influencing their occurrence is crucial. In comprehensive storage trials conducted under controlled conditions, the effects of environment and genotype on rot development and associated quality changes were investigated. Prevalent species involved in rot development were identified by a newly developed microarray. The strongest effect on rot development was assigned to environment factors followed by genotypic effects. Despite large variation in rot severity (sample range 0 to 84%), the spectrum of microorganisms colonizing sugar beet remained fairly constant across all treatments with dominant species belonging to the fungal genera Botrytis, Fusarium, and Penicillium. The intensity of microbial tissue necrotization was strongly correlated with sucrose losses (R² = 0.79 to 0.91) and invert sugar accumulation (R² = 0.91 to 0.95). A storage rot resistance bioassay was developed that could successfully reproduce the genotype ranking observed in storage trials. Quantification of fungal biomass indicates that genetic resistance is based on a quantitative mechanism. Further work is required to understand the large environmental influence on rot development in sugar beet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26474333     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-15-0172-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  6 in total

1.  Integrative transcriptomics reveals genotypic impact on sugar beet storability.

Authors:  Silvia Madritsch; Svenja Bomers; Alexandra Posekany; Agnes Burg; Rebekka Birke; Florian Emerstorfer; Reinhard Turetschek; Sandra Otte; Herbert Eigner; Eva M Sehr
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets.

Authors:  Peter Kusstatscher; Christin Zachow; Karsten Harms; Johann Maier; Herbert Eigner; Gabriele Berg; Tomislav Cernava
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Cell-Wall-Degrading Enzymes-Related Genes Originating from Rhizoctonia solani Increase Sugar Beet Root Damage in the Presence of Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

Authors:  Rajtilak Majumdar; Carl A Strausbaugh; Paul J Galewski; Rakesh Minocha; Christopher W Rogers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Unraveling metabolic patterns and molecular mechanisms underlying storability in sugar beet.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Gippert; Silvia Madritsch; Patrick Woryna; Sandra Otte; Martina Mayrhofer; Herbert Eigner; Adriana Garibay-Hernández; John C D'Auria; Eva M Molin; Hans-Peter Mock
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.260

5.  Antibacterial Activity of Endophytic Bacteria Against Sugar Beet Root Rot Agent by Volatile Organic Compound Production and Induction of Systemic Resistance.

Authors:  Somayeh Safara; Behrouz Harighi; Bahman Bahramnejad; Slahadin Ahmadi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Two sugar beet chitinase genes, BvSP2 and BvSE2, analysed with SNP Amplifluor-like markers, are highly expressed after Fusarium root rot inoculations and field susceptibility trial.

Authors:  Raushan Yerzhebayeva; Alfiya Abekova; Kerimkul Konysbekov; Sholpan Bastaubayeva; Aynur Kabdrakhmanova; Aiman Absattarova; Yuri Shavrukov
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.