Literature DB >> 26473554

Sex differences in neurophysiological responses are modulated by attentional aspects of impulse control.

Kazufumi Omura1, Kenji Kusumoto2.   

Abstract

The amplitudes of the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) may be influenced by personality traits such as impulsivity, and male/female differences may also have an effect. However, few studies have assessed the interaction between personality traits and the sex of the subject in these components. Therefore, in this study we evaluated sex differences in the amplitudes of the N2 and P3 ERP components during a continuous performance task, and their relation to impulse control. Twenty-seven healthy participants were asked to perform an AX-type continuous performance task, also known as a Go/Nogo task, during electroencephalographic recording. Participants then completed the Barratt impulsiveness scale (version 11; BIS-11), and the effortful control (EC) scale to self-report personality measures related to impulse control. We found that in the Nogo condition, males showed significantly larger N2 amplitudes than females in the frontal area. Interestingly, Nogo-N2 amplitudes were positively correlated with BIS-attentional subscale scores, but were negatively correlated with EC-attentional subscale scores, and both correlations were observed only in males. These results suggest that attentional aspects of impulse control modulate Nogo-N2 amplitude only in males. This modulatory effect may be related to a sex-specific inhibitory control mechanism acting during early stimulus evaluation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barratt impulsiveness scale; Continuous performance task; Effortful control scale; Event-related potentials; Executive attention; Trait impulsivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26473554     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  6 in total

1.  Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.

Authors:  Sigita Melynyte; Osvaldas Ruksenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.

Authors:  Nicola M Grissom; Teresa M Reyes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Auditory evoked potential could reflect emotional sensitivity and impulsivity.

Authors:  Ji Sun Kim; Sungkean Kim; Wookyoung Jung; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dysfunctional frontal lobe activity during inhibitory tasks in individuals with childhood trauma: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Sungkean Kim; Ji Sun Kim; Min Jin Jin; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Altered cortical functional network during behavioral inhibition in individuals with childhood trauma.

Authors:  Sungkean Kim; Ji Sun Kim; Miseon Shim; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Brain Correlates of Adult-Onset Depression: A Pilot Structural and Functional 3T MRI Study.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Piani; Eleonora Maggioni; Giuseppe Delvecchio; Adele Ferro; Davide Gritti; Sara M Pozzoli; Elisa Fontana; Paolo Enrico; Claudia M Cinnante; Fabio M Triulzi; Jeffrey A Stanley; Elena Battaglioli; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.