Literature DB >> 26473521

Muscle Size Not Density Predicts Variance in Muscle Strength and Neuromuscular Performance in Healthy Adult Men and Women.

Benjamin K Weeks1, Tom A J Gerrits, Sean A Horan, Belinda R Beck.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)-derived measures of muscle area and density and markers of muscle strength and performance in men and women. Fifty-two apparently healthy adults (26 men, 26 women; age 33.8 ± 12.0 years) volunteered to participate. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (XR-800; Norland Medical Systems, Inc., Trumbull, CT, USA) was used to determine whole body and regional lean and fat tissue mass, whereas pQCT (XCT-3000; Stratec, Pforzheim, Germany) was used to determine muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and muscle density of the leg, thigh, and forearm. Ankle plantar flexor and knee extensor strengths were examined using isokinetic dynamometry, and grip strength was examined with dynamometry. Impulse generated during a maximal vertical jump was used as an index of neuromuscular performance. Thigh, forearm, and leg MCSA strongly predicted variance in knee extensor (R = 0.77, p < 0.001) and grip strength (R = 0.77, p < 0.001) and weakly predicted variance in ankle plantar flexor strength (R = 0.20, p < 0.001), respectively, whereas muscle density was only a weak predictor of variance in knee extensor strength (R = 0.18, p < 0.001). Thigh and leg MCSA accounted for 79 and 69% of the variance in impulse generated from a maximal vertical jump (p < 0.001), whereas thigh muscle density predicted only 18% of the variance (p < 0.002). In conclusion, we found that pQCT-derived muscle area is more strongly related to strength and neuromuscular performance than muscle density in adult men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26473521     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason B White; Y Eliot Hu; Jason D Stone; Jonathan M Oliver; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The Relationships between Hip and Knee Extensor Cross-Sectional Area, Strength, Power, and Potentiation Characteristics.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 3.  Associations Between Measures of Physical Activity and Muscle Size and Strength: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zachary P Rostron; Rodney A Green; Michael Kingsley; Anita Zacharias
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-03-27

4.  A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial.

Authors:  Conor Lambert; Belinda R Beck; Amy T Harding; Steven L Watson; Benjamin K Weeks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.