Literature DB >> 26473193

Clinical Application of Prognostic Gene Expression Signature in Fusion Gene-Negative Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Pooja Hingorani1, Edoardo Missiaglia2, Janet Shipley3, James R Anderson4, Timothy J Triche5, Mauro Delorenzi6, Julie Gastier-Foster7, Michele Wing7, Douglas S Hawkins8, Stephen X Skapek9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has two common histologic subtypes: embryonal (ERMS) and alveolar (ARMS). PAX-FOXO1 fusion gene status is a more reliable prognostic marker than alveolar histology, whereas fusion gene-negative (FN) ARMS patients are clinically similar to ERMS patients. A five-gene expression signature (MG5) previously identified two diverse risk groups within the fusion gene-negative RMS (FN-RMS) patients, but this has not been independently validated. The goal of this study was to test whether expression of the MG5 metagene, measured using a technical platform that can be applied to routine pathology material, would correlate with outcome in a new cohort of patients with FN-RMS. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Cases were taken from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) D9803 study of children with intermediate-risk RMS, and gene expression profiling for the MG5 genes was performed using the nCounter assay. The MG5 score was correlated with clinical and pathologic characteristics as well as overall and event-free survival.
RESULTS: MG5 standardized score showed no significant association with any of the available clinicopathologic variables. The MG5 signature score showed a significant correlation with overall (N = 57; HR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.9-27.0; P = 0.003) and failure-free survival (N = 57; HR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.9-19.7; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first, validated molecular prognostic signature for children with FN-RMS who otherwise have intermediate-risk disease. The capacity to measure the expression of a small number of genes in routine pathology material and apply a simple mathematical formula to calculate the MG5 metagene score provides a clear path toward better risk stratification in future prospective clinical trials. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26473193      PMCID: PMC4610152          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

1.  Cell-type-specific regulation of distinct sets of gene targets by Pax3 and Pax3/FKHR.

Authors:  Salma Begum; Nashmil Emami; Nashmil Emani; Albert Cheung; Olivia Wilkins; Sandy Der; Paul A Hamel
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Increased expression of the metastasis-associated gene Ehm2 in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianghua Wang; Yi Cai; Rebecca Penland; Sanjay Chauhan; Roger L Miesfeld; Michael Ittmann
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Overexpression of Ephrin A2 receptors in cancer stromal cells is a prognostic factor for the relapse of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shojiro Kikuchi; Nobuaki Kaibe; Koji Morimoto; Hirokazu Fukui; Hirotaka Niwa; Yoshihiro Maeyama; Masashi Takemura; Masaki Matsumoto; Shoji Nakamori; Hiroto Miwa; Seiichi Hirota; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Gene expression profiling for survival prediction in pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Elai Davicioni; James R Anderson; Jonathan D Buckley; William H Meyer; Timothy J Triche
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  JARID2 is a direct target of the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion protein and inhibits myogenic differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Z S Walters; B Villarejo-Balcells; D Olmos; T W S Buist; E Missiaglia; R Allen; B Al-Lazikani; M D Garrett; J Blagg; J Shipley
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Gene fusions involving PAX and FOX family members in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  F G Barr
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Fusion of a fork head domain gene to PAX3 in the solid tumour alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  N Galili; R J Davis; W J Fredericks; S Mukhopadhyay; F J Rauscher; B S Emanuel; G Rovera; F G Barr
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Roles of enhancer of zeste homolog 2: from skeletal muscle differentiation to rhabdomyosarcoma carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Irene Marchesi; Antonio Giordano; Luigi Bagella
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  High expression of Polycomb group protein EZH2 predicts poor survival in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Authors:  H Vékony; F M Raaphorst; A P Otte; M van Lohuizen; C R Leemans; I van der Waal; E Bloemena
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  EphA2 promotes infiltrative invasion of glioma stem cells in vivo through cross-talk with Akt and regulates stem cell properties.

Authors:  H Miao; N W Gale; H Guo; J Qian; A Petty; J Kaspar; A J Murphy; D M Valenzuela; G Yancopoulos; D Hambardzumyan; J D Lathia; J N Rich; J Lee; B Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  6 in total

1.  45 Gy is not sufficient radiotherapy dose for Group III orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma after less than complete response to 12 weeks of ARST0331 chemotherapy: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Ralph P Ermoian; John Breneman; David O Walterhouse; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jane Meza; James Anderson; Douglas S Hawkins; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; David M Parham; Torunn I Yock; Sarah S Donaldson; Suzanne L Wolden
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Molecular diagnostics in the management of rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Michael A Arnold; Fredric G Barr
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  A Step Forward in Realizing the Promise of Genomic Medicine for Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Leo Mascarenhas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 4.  Targeted therapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Diana A Steppan; Christine A Pratilas; David M Loeb
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2017-03-30

5.  Refinement of risk stratification for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma using FOXO1 fusion status in addition to established clinical outcome predictors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Emily Hibbitts; Yueh-Yun Chi; Douglas S Hawkins; Frederic G Barr; Julie A Bradley; Roshni Dasgupta; William H Meyer; David A Rodeberg; Erin R Rudzinski; Sheri L Spunt; Stephen X Skapek; Suzanne L Wolden; Carola A S Arndt
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Progress in pediatrics in 2015: choices in allergy, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, haematology, infectious diseases, neonatology, nephrology, neurology, nutrition, oncology and pulmonology.

Authors:  Carlo Caffarelli; Francesca Santamaria; Dora Di Mauro; Carla Mastrorilli; Virginia Mirra; Sergio Bernasconi
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.638

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.