Literature DB >> 26472406

A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing a combination of repeated intravitreal Ozurdex and macular laser therapy versus macular laser only in centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (OZLASE study).

Ling Zhi Heng1, Sobha Sivaprasad1, Roxanne Crosby-Nwaobi1, Zubin Saihan1, Mike Karampelas1, Catey Bunce1, Tunde Peto1, Philip G Hykin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combined repeated Ozurdex and macular laser therapy (MLT) compared with MLT monotherapy in participants with visual impairment due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO).
METHODS: 80 patients with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 54 and 78 ETDRS letters due to centre-involving DMO were randomised to combination therapy with Ozurdex and MLT or MLT only. The combination arm received mandated Ozurdex injections at baseline and 16 weeks followed by retreatment criteria-guided pro-re-nata therapy at 32 and 48 weeks. Patients randomised to MLT only were treated every 16 weeks if clinically significant macular oedema was present. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in BCVA between arms at 56 weeks.
RESULTS: The mean change in BCVA at 56 weeks was -0.3 (SD 11.4) ETDRS letters in the combination arm versus +0.4 (SD 9.6) ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study) letters in the MLT arm (effect estimate 1.15 (95% CI -3.32 to 5.61)). However, at 56 weeks, a post hoc comparison of central subfield thickness (CST) showed a decrease of -113 μm (IQR -218, -64) (combination) versus -17 μm (-128, 12) (MLT arm) (p<0.001). Elevated intraocular pressure requiring topical therapy was observed in 8 (20%) eyes in the combination versus 1 (2.5%) in the MLT arm. 33% (9/27) of phakic patients in the combination arm underwent cataract surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcome following combination therapy did not differ from MLT alone in the centre-involving DMO despite a significant decrease in CST likely due to an entry visual acuity-related ceiling effect and cataract development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-003339-74. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drugs; Macula; Retina; Treatment Medical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26472406     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Retinal injury following intravitreal injection of a dexamethasone implant in a vitrectomized eye.

Authors:  Seung Min Lee; Jae Woo Jung; Sung Who Park; Ji Eun Lee; Ik Soo Byon
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Identification of time point to best define 'sub-optimal response' following intravitreal ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema based on real-life data.

Authors:  I Chatziralli; M Santarelli; N Patrao; L Nicholson; M Zola; R Rajendram; P Hykin; S Sivaprasad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society, and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Dated August 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Analysis of Funding Source and Spin in the Reporting of Studies of Intravitreal Corticosteroid Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Harrish Nithianandan; Ajay E Kuriyan; Michael J Venincasa; Jayanth Sridhar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-20

5.  Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Intravitreal Steroid Injection in Diabetic Macular Edema: Monitoring and Management.

Authors:  Francisco J Goñi; Ingeborg Stalmans; Philippe Denis; Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Simon Taylor; Michael Diestelhorst; Antonio R Figueiredo; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-05-10

6.  Efficacy of 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN) in eyes with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy.

Authors:  A Meireles; C Goldsmith; I El-Ghrably; A Erginay; M Habib; B Pessoa; J Coelho; T Patel; R Tadayoni; P Massin; J Atorf; A J Augustin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Report of 12-months efficacy and safety of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of chronic diabetic macular oedema: a real-world result in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  F Alfaqawi; P L Lip; S Elsherbiny; R Chavan; A Mitra; B Mushtaq
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.

Authors:  Thanitsara Rittiphairoj; Tahreem A Mir; Tianjing Li; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.