Literature DB >> 26472301

Classification of team sport activities using a single wearable tracking device.

Daniel W T Wundersitz1, Casey Josman2, Ritu Gupta2, Kevin J Netto3, Paul B Gastin4, Sam Robertson5.   

Abstract

Wearable tracking devices incorporating accelerometers and gyroscopes are increasingly being used for activity analysis in sports. However, minimal research exists relating to their ability to classify common activities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether data obtained from a single wearable tracking device can be used to classify team sport-related activities. Seventy-six non-elite sporting participants were tested during a simulated team sport circuit (involving stationary, walking, jogging, running, changing direction, counter-movement jumping, jumping for distance and tackling activities) in a laboratory setting. A MinimaxX S4 wearable tracking device was worn below the neck, in-line and dorsal to the first to fifth thoracic vertebrae of the spine, with tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope data collected at 100Hz. Multiple time domain, frequency domain and custom features were extracted from each sensor using 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5s movement capture durations. Features were further screened using a combination of ANOVA and Lasso methods. Relevant features were used to classify the eight activities performed using the Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Model Tree (LMT) algorithms. The LMT (79-92% classification accuracy) outperformed RF (32-43%) and SVM algorithms (27-40%), obtaining strongest performance using the full model (accelerometer and gyroscope inputs). Processing time can be reduced through feature selection methods (range 1.5-30.2%), however a trade-off exists between classification accuracy and processing time. Movement capture duration also had little impact on classification accuracy or processing time. In sporting scenarios where wearable tracking devices are employed, it is both possible and feasible to accurately classify team sport-related activities.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Logistic Regression Tree; Random Forest; Support Vector Machine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26472301     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Accelerometer Load Profiles for Basketball-Specific Drills in Elite Players.

Authors:  Xavi Schelling; Lorena Torres
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The relationship between movement speed and duration during soccer matches.

Authors:  Kai Roecker; Hubert Mahler; Christian Heyde; Mareike Röll; Albert Gollhofer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validity and reliability of an accelerometer-based player tracking device.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Lorena Torres-Ronda; Kase J Saylor; Xavi Schelling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Systematic evaluation of supervised classifiers for fecal microbiota-based prediction of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luoyan Ai; Haiying Tian; Zhaofei Chen; Huimin Chen; Jie Xu; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-07

6.  Evaluation of sampling frequency, window size and sensor position for classification of sheep behaviour.

Authors:  Emily Walton; Christy Casey; Jurgen Mitsch; Jorge A Vázquez-Diosdado; Juan Yan; Tania Dottorini; Keith A Ellis; Anthony Winterlich; Jasmeet Kaler
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 7.  When Is a Sprint a Sprint? A Review of the Analysis of Team-Sport Athlete Activity Profile.

Authors:  Alice J Sweeting; Stuart J Cormack; Stuart Morgan; Robert J Aughey
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Towards an Efficient One-Class Classifier for Mobile Devices and Wearable Sensors on the Context of Personal Risk Detection.

Authors:  Luis A Trejo; Ari Yair Barrera-Animas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Feature Selection and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classification of Grazing and Rumination Behaviour in Sheep.

Authors:  Nicola Mansbridge; Jurgen Mitsch; Nicola Bollard; Keith Ellis; Giuliana G Miguel-Pacheco; Tania Dottorini; Jasmeet Kaler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Using wearable sensors to classify subject-specific running biomechanical gait patterns based on changes in environmental weather conditions.

Authors:  Nizam Uddin Ahamed; Dylan Kobsar; Lauren Benson; Christian Clermont; Russell Kohrs; Sean T Osis; Reed Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.