Literature DB >> 26472084

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Nails: A Comparison of Nails With and Without Internal Compression.

James Taylor1, Douglas E Lucas2, Aimee Riley1, G Alex Simpson3, Terrence M Philbin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hindfoot arthrodesis with tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) intramedullary nails is used commonly when treating ankle and subtalar arthritis and other hindfoot pathology. Adequate compression is paramount to avoid nonunion and fatigue fracture of the hardware. Arthrodesis systems with internal compression have demonstrated superior compression to systems relying on external methods. This study examined the speed of union with TTC fusion nails with internal compression over nails without internal compression.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed identifying nail type and time to union of the subtalar joint (STJ) and tibiotalar joint (TTJ). A total of 198 patients were included from 2003 to 2011.
RESULTS: The median time to STJ fusion without internal compression was 104 days compared to 92 days with internal compression (P = .044). The median time to TTJ fusion without internal compression was 111 days compared to 93 days with internal compression (P = .010). Adjusting for diabetes, there was no significant difference in fusion speed with or without internal compression for the STJ (P = .561) or TTJ (P = .358). Nonunion rates were 24.5% for the STJ and 17.0% for the TTJ with internal compression, and 43.4% for the STJ and 42.1% for the TTJ without internal compression. This difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for diabetes for the TTJ (P = .001) but not for the STJ (P = .194).
CONCLUSION: The intramedullary hindfoot arthrodesis nail was a viable treatment option in degenerative joint disease of the TTC joint. There appeared to be an advantage using systems with internal compression; however, there was no statistically significant difference after controlling for diabetes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hindfoot fusion; intramedullary nail; subtalar joint; tibiotalar joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26472084     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715611891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis].

Authors:  S F Baumbach; M Braunstein; F Maßen; M Regauer; W Mutschler; W Böcker; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up.

Authors:  Adolfo Perez-Aznar; Blanca Gonzalez-Navarro; Laiz L Bello-Tejeda; Carolina Alonso-Montero; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  New Technique for Tibiotalar Arthrodesis Using a New Intramedullary Nail Device: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Eisenstein; Mario Rodriguez; Amr A Abdelgawad
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease as a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Fractures in Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion With Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Ashwin Bhadresha; Baljinder S Dhinsa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Tibiotalocalcaneal Intramedullary Nailing for Unstable Geriatric Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Elif Kulakli-Inceleme; David B Tas; Diederik P J Smeeing; Roderick M Houwert; Nicole M van Veelen; Bjoern-Christian Link; Lukas D Iselin; Matthias Knobe; Reto Babst; Frank J P Beeres
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.