| Literature DB >> 26472028 |
Hiroki Kobayashi1, Shuhei Komatsu1, Daisuke Ichikawa1, Tsutomu Kawaguchi1, Shoji Hirajima1, Mahito Miyamae1, Wataru Okajima1, Takuma Ohashi1, Toshiyuki Kosuga1, Hirotaka Konishi1, Atsushi Shiozaki1, Hitoshi Fujiwara1, Kazuma Okamoto1, Hitoshi Tsuda2,3, Eigo Otsuji1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase homolog (DTL) has been identified in amplified region (1q32) of several cancers and has an oncogenic function. In this study, we tested whether DTL acts as a cancer-promoting gene through its activation/overexpression in gastric cancer (GC).Entities:
Keywords: DTL; biomarker; gastric cancer; oncogene; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26472028 PMCID: PMC4742199 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Expression profiles of DTL in 7 GC cell lines
A. Quantitative real-time RT–PCR and western blotting analysis were performed using a DTL-specific antibody to determine DTL mRNA (top) and protein (bottom) expression in the gastric cancer cell lines KatoIII, NUGC4, MKN7, HGC27, MKN28, MKN45, and MKN74. DTL overexpression was observed in the KatoIII, NUGC4, HGC27, and MKN28 cells (4/7 lines, 57%). B. A formalin-fixed gastric cancer NUGC4 cell line that overexpresses DTL, in which > 50% of cells stained positively, was used as a positive control; an MKN45 cell line with a low expression of DTL was included as a negative control.
Figure 2Effects of downregulation of DTL expression
A. Loss-of-function screening was undertaken using three small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting DTL in the HGC27 cell. The knockdown of a target DTL gene was confirmed by quantitative real-time RT–PCR (top) and western blotting (bottom). B. To assess cell growth, the numbers of viable cells at various time points after transfection were assessed by the colorimetric water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST) assay in the HGC27 (mutant TP53) and NUGC4 (wild-type TP53) cell lines. C. Transwell migration (upper) and invasion (lower) assays using three siRNAs targeting DTL.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical-staining analyses and postoperative overall survival curve according to the expression of DTL
A. Specific immunostaining of the DTL protein in primary samples was confirmed. Expression of the DTL protein was observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of cancer cells. For scoring DTL expression, the intensity score was defined as 0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2= moderate, 3 = strong. The DTL high expression group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low expression group in overall survival (P = 0.0498, log-rank test) B. and disease-free survival (P = 0.0324, log-rank test) C.
Association between clinicopathologic characteristics and DTL expression
| DTL immunoreactivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high expression | low expression | |||
| Total | 100 | 42 (42%) | 58 (58%) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 59 | 29 (69%) | 30 (52%) | 0.0821 |
| Female | 41 | 13 (31%) | 28 (48%) | |
| Age (y) | ||||
| Mean 61.22 (range:28–87) | ||||
| <60 | 40 | 16 (38%) | 24 (41%) | 0.7407 |
| ≥60 | 60 | 26 (62%) | 34 (59%) | |
| Histopathological grading | ||||
| Differentiated | 45 | 20 (48%) | 25 (43%) | 0.6542 |
| Undifferentiated | 55 | 22 (52%) | 33 (57%) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | ||||
| < 25 | 32 | 12 (28%) | 20 (34%) | 0.5317 |
| ≥25 | 68 | 30 (72%) | 38 (66%) | |
| Venous invasion | ||||
| v0 | 72 | 27 (64%) | 45 (78%) | 0.1462 |
| v1–2 | 25 | 15 (36%) | 10 (17%) | |
| v3 | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 (5%) | |
| Lymphatic invasion | ||||
| ly0 | 55 | 16 (38%) | 39 (67%) | |
| ly1–2 | 39 | 24 (57%) | 15 (26%) | |
| ly3 | 6 | 2 (5%) | 4 (7%) | |
| TNM classification | ||||
| pT categories | ||||
| pT1–3 | 78 | 28 (67%) | 50 (81%) | |
| pT4 | 22 | 14 (33%) | 8 (19%) | |
| pN categories | ||||
| pN0–2 | 84 | 33 (79%) | 51 (86%) | 0.2076 |
| pN3 | 16 | 9 (21%) | 7 (14%) | |
| Recurrennce | ||||
| Absent | 78 | 28 (67%) | 50 (81%) | |
| Present | 22 | 14 (33%) | 8 (19%) | |
NOTE. Significant values are in bold type.
P values are from χ2 or Fisher's exact test and were significant at <0.05.
Multivariate analysis for overall survival using stepwise Cox regression procedures
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | |||||
| Gender | ||||||
| male | 0.8990 | – | ||||
| Age | ||||||
| ≥60 | 0.7325 | – | ||||
| Histological type | ||||||
| Undiffe.versus Diffe. | 0.7982 | – | ||||
| Tumor size (mm) | ||||||
| ≥25 | < | – | ||||
| Venous invasion | ||||||
| v2–3 | < | – | ||||
| Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
| ly2–3 | < | 12.74 | 4.045 | – | 40.05 | < |
| pT-stage | ||||||
| T4 | < | – | ||||
| pN-stage | ||||||
| N3 | 7.591 | 2.661 | – | 21.65 | ||
| DTL expression | ||||||
| high | 3.709 | 1.360 | – | 10.11 | ||
Kaplan and Meier method, and the statistical significance was determined by log-rank test
Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazard model
HR:hazard ratio
CI:confidence interval