Jamie M Segel1, William S Duke1, Jennifer R White1, Jennifer L Waller2, David J Terris3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA. Electronic address: dterris@gru.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Outpatient thyroid surgery is becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study was to clarify the principles for safe outpatient thyroid surgery and review our outcomes with the use of a protocol for outpatient thyroidectomy in a large patient cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic analysis of a prospectively maintained database of outcomes of thyroidectomy in a tertiary endocrine surgery practice. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A protocol for outpatient thyroidectomy was conceived and refined over 3 years. A prospective analysis of all thyroidectomies accomplished by a single surgeon who used this protocol from May 2006 to November 2013 was then undertaken. Patient demographics, operative and pathologic data, admission status, complications, and readmission rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,311 thyroidectomy procedures were performed during the study period, of which 1,026 (78.3 %) were conducted on an outpatient basis. The readmission rate for outpatients was 0.9%, with only 1 readmission in the last 200 procedures. Inpatients (which included patients in the 23-hour "observation" category) were readmitted more often than outpatients (3.5% vs 0.9%, P < .01). Outpatient management increased steadily throughout the study period (from 59.7% to 92.3%, P < .01), despite a larger mean nodule size and a greater rate of malignancy over time. There were no changes in the complication rate across the study timeframe except for the incidence of temporary hypocalcemia, which decreased over time (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Outpatient thyroid surgery is safe in appropriately selected patients using an optimized and systematic protocol. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES:Outpatient thyroid surgery is becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study was to clarify the principles for safe outpatient thyroid surgery and review our outcomes with the use of a protocol for outpatient thyroidectomy in a large patient cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic analysis of a prospectively maintained database of outcomes of thyroidectomy in a tertiary endocrine surgery practice. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A protocol for outpatient thyroidectomy was conceived and refined over 3 years. A prospective analysis of all thyroidectomies accomplished by a single surgeon who used this protocol from May 2006 to November 2013 was then undertaken. Patient demographics, operative and pathologic data, admission status, complications, and readmission rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,311 thyroidectomy procedures were performed during the study period, of which 1,026 (78.3 %) were conducted on an outpatient basis. The readmission rate for outpatients was 0.9%, with only 1 readmission in the last 200 procedures. Inpatients (which included patients in the 23-hour "observation" category) were readmitted more often than outpatients (3.5% vs 0.9%, P < .01). Outpatient management increased steadily throughout the study period (from 59.7% to 92.3%, P < .01), despite a larger mean nodule size and a greater rate of malignancy over time. There were no changes in the complication rate across the study timeframe except for the incidence of temporary hypocalcemia, which decreased over time (P < .01). CONCLUSION:Outpatient thyroid surgery is safe in appropriately selected patients using an optimized and systematic protocol. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: F Tartaglia; A Giuliani; S Sorrenti; L Tromba; S Carbotta; A Maturo; G Carbotta; L De Anna; R Merola; G Livadoti; F Pelle; S Ulisse Journal: G Chir Date: 2016 Nov-Dec
Authors: Eun Ho Eunice Choi; Fares Qeadan; Eyas Alkhalili; Christina Lovato; Mark R Burge Journal: J Investig Med Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Mohammed AlEssa; Samiah S Al-Angari; Mohammed Jomah; Aqeel AlOqaili; Muhammad Mujammami; Hadi A Al-Hakami; Saleh F Al-Dhahri Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 1.484