Literature DB >> 26471473

Immunocytochemical detection of ERG expression in exfoliated urinary cells identifies with high specificity patients with prostate cancer.

Raj P Pal1,2, Roger C Kockelbergh2, John Howard Pringle1, Lara Cresswell3, Roger Hew4, John P Dormer4, Colin Cooper5, John Kilian Mellon2, Julian G Barwell6, Edward J Hollox6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immunocytochemical detection of ERG protein in exfoliated cells as a means of identifying patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples (30 mL) were collected after digital rectal examination (DRE) from 159 patients with an elevated age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or an abnormal DRE who underwent prostate biopsy. In all cases, exfoliated urinary cells from half of the urine sample underwent immunocytochemical assessment for ERG protein expression. Exfoliated cells in the remaining half underwent assessment of TMPRSS2:ERG status using either nested reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR (151 cases) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; eight cases). Corresponding tissue samples were evaluated using FISH to determine chromosomal gene fusion tissue status and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine ERG protein expression. Results were correlated with clinicopathological variables.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of urinary ERG immunocytochemistry (ICC) for PCa were 22.7 and 100%, respectively. ERG ICC results correlated with advanced tumour grade, stage and higher serum PSA. In comparison, urine TMPRSS2:ERG transcript analysis had 27% sensitivity and 98% specificity for PCa detection. On tissue IHC, ERG staining was highly specific for PCa. In all, 52% of cancers harboured foci of ERG staining; however, only 46% of cancers that were found to have ERG overexpression were positive on urine ICC. The ERG ICC results showed strong concordance with urinary RT-PCR and FISH, and tissue IHC and FISH.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that cytological gene fusion detection using ICC is feasible and identifies patients with adverse disease markers. ERG ICC was highly specific, but this technique was less sensitive than RT-PCR.
© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG; gene fusions; prostate cancer; protein; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26471473     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ethnicity and ERG frequency in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jason Sedarsky; Michael Degon; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis Significance of ERG Methylation as a Biomarker in Down's Syndrome.

Authors:  Xiangju Liu; Ming Xue
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-01-23

3.  Detection of glypican-1 (GPC-1) expression in urine cell sediments in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas H Campbell; Maria E Lund; Aline L Nocon; Paul J Cozzi; Mark Frydenberg; Paul De Souza; Belinda Schiller; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Julie J Ruterbusch; Bradley J Walsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.