Literature DB >> 26471160

Commentary on Gelberg et al. 2015: Alcohol and other drug screening and brief intervention--evidence in crisis.

Richard Saitz1.   

Abstract

Most evidence suggests that drug screening and brief intervention (SBI) is not efficacious. Conflicting study results may be due to different interventions, and methodological differences may explain most positive SBI trial results. A renewed focus should be on objective outcomes and intervention details.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; brief intervention; cannabis; drugs; prevention; primary care; screening

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26471160     DOI： 10.1111/add.13054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN： 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  3 in total

1.  Substance use among persons with homeless experience in primary care.

Authors:  Erin J Stringfellow; Theresa W Kim; Adam J Gordon; David E Pollio; Richard A Grucza; Erika L Austin; N Kay Johnson; Stefan G Kertesz
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

2.  Documented brief intervention associated with reduced linkage to specialty addictions treatment in a national sample of VA patients with unhealthy alcohol use with and without alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Madeline C Frost; Joseph E Glass; Katharine A Bradley; Emily C Williams
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Therapist and computer-based brief interventions for drug use within a randomized controlled trial: effects on parallel trajectories of alcohol use, cannabis use and anxiety symptoms.

Authors:  Laura E Drislane; Rebecca Waller; Meghan E Martz; Erin E Bonar; Maureen A Walton; Stephen T Chermack; Frederic C Blow
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.526
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.