Literature DB >> 26471138

Comparison of Twitch Responses During Current- or Voltage-Controlled Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

José Luis Vargas Luna1,2,3, Matthias Krenn1, Stefan Löfler4, Helmut Kern4,5, Jorge A Cortés R2, Winfried Mayr1.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an established method for functional restoration of muscle function, rehabilitation, and diagnostics. In this work, NMES was applied with surface electrodes placed on the anterior thigh to identify the main differences between current-controlled (CC) and voltage-controlled (VC) modes. Measurements of the evoked knee extension force and the myoelectric signal of quadriceps and hamstrings were taken during stimulation with different amplitudes, pulse widths, and stimulation techniques. The stimulation pulses were rectangular and symmetric biphasic for both stimulation modes. The electrode-tissue impedance influences the differences between CC and VC stimulation. The main difference is that for CC stimulation, variation of pulse width and amplitude influences the amount of nerve depolarization, whereas VC stimulation is only dependent on amplitude variations for pulse widths longer than 150 μs. An important remark is that these findings are strongly dependent on the characteristics of the electrode-skin interface. In our case, we used large stimulation electrodes placed on the anterior thigh, which cause higher capacitive effects. The controllability, voltage compliance, and charge characteristics of each stimulation technique should be considered during the stimulators design. For applications that require the activation of a large amount of nerve fibers, VC is a more suitable option. In contrast, if the application requires a high controllability, then CC should be chosen prior to VC.
Copyright © 2015 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constant current; Constant voltage; Current-controlled; Functional electrical stimulation; Neuroprosthetics; Twitch force response; Voltage-controlled

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26471138     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  4 in total

1.  The 2022 On-site Padua Days on Muscle and Mobility Medicine hosts the University of Florida Institute of Myology and the Wellstone Center, March 30 - April 3, 2022 at the University of Padua and Thermae of Euganean Hills, Padua, Italy: The collection of abstracts.

Authors:  H Lee Sweeney; Stefano Masiero; Ugo Carraro
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-03-10

2.  Perception thresholds and qualitative perceptions for electrocutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Dölker; Stephan Lau; Maria Anne Bernhard; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Nerve excitation using an amplitude-modulated signal with kilohertz-frequency carrier and non-zero offset.

Authors:  Leonel E Medina; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Sub-threshold depolarizing pre-pulses can enhance the efficiency of biphasic stimuli in transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jose Luis Vargas Luna; Winfried Mayr; Jorge-Armando Cortés-Ramirez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.602

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.