BACKGROUND: Synchronous occurrence of esophageal and head and neck (H&N) cancers is frequently observed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 109 patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and H&N treated between 2005 and 2011. Fifty-one patients underwent synchronous treatment and 58 underwent staged treatment. We measured the delay in treatment for the second cancer in the staged treatment group and evaluated how many patients experienced progression of the second cancer during the first cancer treatment. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed in 100 patients who underwent potentially curative treatment. RESULTS: Synchronous treatment strategy was frequently selected for patients with both advanced cancers (77 %) compared with those who had early cancers in either or both organs (43 %) (P = 0.02). The median delay in the treatment for the second cancer was 80 days; 77.5 days in the H&N-first group and 96 days in the esophagus-first group. Only one patient experienced stage progression during the waiting period. There was no significant difference in OS between the synchronous treatment group and the staged treatment group (P = 0.73), and no significant difference in OS among patients who had advanced cancer in the H&N, esophagus, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of patients with synchronous cancers depends on that of the more advanced cancer, and waiting for treatment of early cancers may not influence survival. The staged treatment strategy is acceptable when either of the double cancers is at an early stage.
BACKGROUND: Synchronous occurrence of esophageal and head and neck (H&N) cancers is frequently observed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 109 patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and H&N treated between 2005 and 2011. Fifty-one patients underwent synchronous treatment and 58 underwent staged treatment. We measured the delay in treatment for the second cancer in the staged treatment group and evaluated how many patients experienced progression of the second cancer during the first cancer treatment. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed in 100 patients who underwent potentially curative treatment. RESULTS: Synchronous treatment strategy was frequently selected for patients with both advanced cancers (77 %) compared with those who had early cancers in either or both organs (43 %) (P = 0.02). The median delay in the treatment for the second cancer was 80 days; 77.5 days in the H&N-first group and 96 days in the esophagus-first group. Only one patient experienced stage progression during the waiting period. There was no significant difference in OS between the synchronous treatment group and the staged treatment group (P = 0.73), and no significant difference in OS among patients who had advanced cancer in the H&N, esophagus, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of patients with synchronous cancers depends on that of the more advanced cancer, and waiting for treatment of early cancers may not influence survival. The staged treatment strategy is acceptable when either of the double cancers is at an early stage.
Authors: He Shuangba; Sun Jingwu; Wang Yinfeng; Hu Yanming; Lv Qiuping; Li Xianguang; Xu Weiqing; Wang Shengjun; Yu Zhenkun Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 1.808