| Literature DB >> 26470374 |
Stefano Civolani1, Mauro Boselli2, Alda Butturini2, Milvia Chicca3, Stefano Cassanelli4, Maria Grazia Tommasini5, Vassilis Aschonitis3, Elisa Anna Fano3.
Abstract
Aim of the study was to investigate the performance of the new insecticide "spirotetramat" as an alternative solution of "abamectin" for the control of Cacopsylla pyri L. (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in the context of an IPM program in European pear, Pyrus communis L.. Laboratory bioassays for the estimation of LC50 and LC90 of both insecticides were performed using four populations collected in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) orchards where different pest management strategies were used (organic, integrated, and conventional). The same populations were also analyzed for the main insecticide detoxifying activities in nymphs by spectrofluorimetric in vitro assays. The performance of the two insecticides was also tested on field on one population under integrated pest management conditions. The laboratory experiments showed that the LC90 of spirotetramat were lower than the highest field concentration allowed in Europe (172.80 mg AI liter(-1)) giving reassurance about the efficacy of the product. Concerning the abamectin, the laboratory bioassays did not show strong indications of resistance development of C. pyri populations of Emilia-Romagna. A similarity in enzyme detoxifying activity was observed in both insecticides indicating a general absence of a significant insecticide resistance. The field trial showed a high efficacy (>90 %) of spirotetramat on C. pyri already after 15 d from application, and it was significantly higher from abamectin. Overall, spirotetramat is one more choice for C. pyri control, as well as abamectin in order to minimize the risks of occurrence of insecticide resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Cacopsylla pyri; insecticide resistance; psylla control; spirotetramat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26470374 DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Econ Entomol ISSN: 0022-0493 Impact factor: 2.381