Literature DB >> 26470292

Interactions Within Susceptible Hosts Drive Establishment of Genetically Distinct Variants of an Insect-Borne Pathogen.

G K Blaisdell1, S Zhang1, J R Bratburd1, K M Daane1, M L Cooper2, R P P Almeida3.   

Abstract

Coinfections are common, leading to pathogen interactions during transmission and establishment in a host. However, few studies have tested the relative strengths of pathogen interactions in vectors and hosts that determine the outcome of infection. We tested interactions between two genetically distinct variants of the mealybug-transmitted Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3. The transmission efficiency of each variant in single variant inoculations by two vector species was determined. The effects of vector species, a coinfected source, and simultaneous inoculation from multiple hosts to one host on variant establishment were examined. Within-vector interactions could have a role in transmission from hosts containing mixed infections, but not when vectors were moved from separate singly infected source plants to a single recipient plant. The invasive Planococcus ficus (Signoret) was a more efficient vector than Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret). Transmission efficiency of the two variants did not differ in single variant inoculations. Overall infections were the same whether from singly or coinfected source plants. In mixed inoculations, establishment of one variant was reduced. Mixed inoculations from two singly infected source plants resulted in fewer mixed infections than expected by chance. Therefore, the observed outcome was determined subsequent to host inoculation rather than in the vector. The outcome may be due to resource competition between pathogens. Alternatively apparent competition may be responsible; the pathogens' differential ability to overcome host defenses and colonize the host may determine the final outcome of new infections. Detailed knowledge of interactions between pathogens during transmission and establishment could improve understanding and management of disease spread.
© The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3; Planococcus ficus; Pseudococcus viburni; apparent competition; resource competition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26470292     DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Retention and Transmission of Grapevine Leafroll-Associated Virus 3 by Pseudococcus calceolariae.

Authors:  Brogan McGreal; Manoharie Sandanayaka; Rebecca Gough; Roshni Rohra; Vicky Davis; Christina W Marshall; Kate Richards; Vaughn A Bell; Kar Mun Chooi; Robin M MacDiarmid
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Identification of Vitis Cultivars, Rootstocks, and Species Expressing Resistance to a Planococcus Mealybug.

Authors:  Rachel P Naegele; Peter Cousins; Kent M Daane
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Transmission of Grapevine Ampelo- and Vitiviruses by the Bohemian Mealybug Heliococcus bohemicus Šulc (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).

Authors:  Gérard Hommay; Monique Beuve; Etienne Herrbach
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.818

4.  Relative Prevalence of Grapevine Leafroll-Associated Virus Species in Wine Grape-Growing Regions of California.

Authors:  Abhineet M Sharma; Breanna Baraff; John T Hutchins; Michelle K Wong; G Kai Blaisdell; Monica L Cooper; Kent M Daane; Rodrigo P P Almeida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.