Literature DB >> 26470250

Laboratory and Field Evaluations of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Baits Against Argentine Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Michael K Rust1, Andrew Soeprono2, Sarajean Wright2, Les Greenberg2, Dong-Hwan Choe2, Christina L Boser3, Coleen Cory3, Cause Hanna4.   

Abstract

The development of effective baits to control the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), has been problematic because foragers prefer sweet liquids, while many toxicants are insoluble in water and liquid baits are generally difficult to deliver. The incorporation of thiamethoxam and sucrose solutions into a water-absorbing polyacrylamide hydrogel provides a unique and novel carrier and method of application for liquid baits. Formulations of thiamethoxam affected the size of the hydrogels, and sucrose solutions containing 0.0003% technical thiamethoxam provided hydrogels as large as those made with 25% sucrose solution or deionized water. Concentrations of thiamethoxam as low as 0.000075% in the hydrogels provided 50% kill of workers within 3 d in a laboratory setting. In small colony studies, baiting with 0.00015 and 0.000075% thiamethoxam hydrogels provided 100% mortality of workers and queens within 8 d. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay indicated that thiamethoxam was absorbed into the interior of the polyacrylamide matrix. The water loss rates of the hydrogels were dependent upon the relative humidity. Polyacrylamide hydrogels with >50% water loss were less attractive to ants. Field studies in highly infested areas indicated that concentrations of 0.0006 or 0.0018% thiamethoxam were more effective than 0.00015%. Hydrogels may provide a cost-effective alternative to providing aqueous baits to control Argentine ants.
© The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Linepithema humile; polyacrylamide hydrogel; thiamethoxam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26470250     DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Long-term effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on ants.

Authors:  Daniel Schläppi; Nina Kettler; Lars Straub; Gaétan Glauser; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 2.  Gel Carriers for Plant Extracts and Synthetic Pesticides in Rodent and Arthropod Pest Control: An Overview.

Authors:  Jawad Ali Shah; Tomas Vendl; Radek Aulicky; Marcela Frankova; Vaclav Stejskal
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-08-20

Review 3.  Alternative Methods of Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Control with Emphasis on the Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile.

Authors:  Daniel R Suiter; Benjamin M Gochnour; Jacob B Holloway; Karen M Vail
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 4.  Review of Ecologically-Based Pest Management in California Vineyards.

Authors:  Houston Wilson; Kent M Daane
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Hydrogels: From Controlled Release to a New Bait Delivery for Insect Pest Management.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Tay; Dong-Hwan Choe; Ashok Mulchandani; Michael K Rust
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.