Literature DB >> 26469796

Can combining triple-arterial phase acquisition with fluoroscopic triggering provide both optimal early and late hepatic arterial phase images during gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

Keitaro Sofue1,2, Daniele Marin1, Tracy A Jaffe1, Rendon C Nelson1, Mustafa R Bashir1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether triple-arterial phase acquisition with fluoroscopic triggering can provide both well-timed early and late hepatic arterial phase (HAP) images more frequently than when using a fixed-time delay during gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Written informed consent was obtained for this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant study. Ninety patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at 3T with a single-breath-hold triple-arterial phase acquisition using either a fixed-time delay (n = 45) or fluoroscopic triggering injection protocol (n = 45). Three radiologists, blinded to method of timing and other data, independently determined whether well-timed early or late HAP were obtained for each arterial phase image set and assessed for transient severe motion (TSM). Rates of successful HAP acquisitions and of TSM were compared between the two protocols using χ(2) or Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The rate of successful acquisition of late HAP images was similar in the two groups (93% [42/45] for fixed-time delay vs. 98% [44/45] for fluoroscopic triggering, P = 0.62). There was a trend toward higher rates of successful acquisition of both early and late HAP images in the fluoroscopic triggering group (69% [31/45] vs. 49% [22/45], P = 0.05). TSM occurred in five patients (6% [5/90]) and at similar frequencies in the two groups (2% [1/45] vs. 9% [4/45], P = 0.36).
CONCLUSION: Triple-arterial phase acquisition with fluoroscopic triggering tended to provide both well-timed early and late HAP images more frequently than when using a fixed-time delay during gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26469796     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the Timing of Hepatic Arterial Phase and Image Quality Using Test-Bolus and Bolus-Tracking Techniques in Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid-Enhanced Hepatic Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yuji Iyama; Takeshi Nakaura; Koichi Yokoyama; Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Tomohiro Namimoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Gd-EOB-DTPA MR Imaging.

Authors:  Takamichi Murakami; Keitaro Sofue; Masatoshi Hori
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.760

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.