OBJECTIVE: Using the Medtronic Activa® PC + S system, this study investigated how passive joint manipulation, reaching behavior, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) modulate local field potential (LFP) activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GP). APPROACH: Five non-human primates were implanted unilaterally with one or more DBS leads. LFPs were collected in montage recordings during resting state conditions and during motor tasks that facilitate the expression of parkinsonian motor signs. These recordings were made in the naïve state in one subject, in the parkinsonian state in two subjects, and in both naïve and parkinsonian states in two subjects. MAIN RESULTS: LFPs measured at rest were consistent over time for a given recording location and parkinsonian state in a given subject; however, LFPs were highly variable between subjects, between and within recording locations, and across parkinsonian states. LFPs in both naïve and parkinsonian states across all recorded nuclei contained a spectral peak in the beta band (10-30 Hz). Moreover, the spectral content of recorded LFPs was modulated by passive and active movement of the subjects' limbs. LFPs recorded during a cued-reaching task displayed task-related beta desynchronization in STN and GP. The bidirectional capabilities of the Activa® PC + S also allowed for recording LFPs while delivering DBS. The therapeutic effect of STN DBS on parkinsonian rigidity outlasted stimulation for 30-60 s, but there was no correlation with beta band power. SIGNIFICANCE: This study emphasizes (1) the variability in spontaneous LFPs amongst subjects and (2) the value of using the Activa® PC + S system to record neural data in the context of behavioral tasks that allow one to evaluate a subject's symptomatology.
OBJECTIVE: Using the Medtronic Activa® PC + S system, this study investigated how passive joint manipulation, reaching behavior, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) modulate local field potential (LFP) activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GP). APPROACH: Five non-human primates were implanted unilaterally with one or more DBS leads. LFPs were collected in montage recordings during resting state conditions and during motor tasks that facilitate the expression of parkinsonian motor signs. These recordings were made in the naïve state in one subject, in the parkinsonian state in two subjects, and in both naïve and parkinsonian states in two subjects. MAIN RESULTS: LFPs measured at rest were consistent over time for a given recording location and parkinsonian state in a given subject; however, LFPs were highly variable between subjects, between and within recording locations, and across parkinsonian states. LFPs in both naïve and parkinsonian states across all recorded nuclei contained a spectral peak in the beta band (10-30 Hz). Moreover, the spectral content of recorded LFPs was modulated by passive and active movement of the subjects' limbs. LFPs recorded during a cued-reaching task displayed task-related beta desynchronization in STN and GP. The bidirectional capabilities of the Activa® PC + S also allowed for recording LFPs while delivering DBS. The therapeutic effect of STN DBS on parkinsonian rigidity outlasted stimulation for 30-60 s, but there was no correlation with beta band power. SIGNIFICANCE: This study emphasizes (1) the variability in spontaneous LFPs amongst subjects and (2) the value of using the Activa® PC + S system to record neural data in the context of behavioral tasks that allow one to evaluate a subject's symptomatology.
Authors: Scott F Lempka; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Matthew D Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Andreas Kupsch; Reiner Benecke; Jörg Müller; Thomas Trottenberg; Gerd-Helge Schneider; Werner Poewe; Wilhelm Eisner; Alexander Wolters; Jan-Uwe Müller; Günther Deuschl; Marcus O Pinsker; Inger Marie Skogseid; Geir Ketil Roeste; Juliane Vollmer-Haase; Angela Brentrup; Martin Krause; Volker Tronnier; Alfons Schnitzler; Jürgen Voges; Guido Nikkhah; Jan Vesper; Markus Naumann; Jens Volkmann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexandros G Androulidakis; Paolo Mazzone; Vladimir Litvak; Will Penny; Michele Dileone; Louise M F Doyle Gaynor; Stephen Tisch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Peter Brown Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2008-01-19 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Nicole C Swann; Coralie de Hemptinne; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Salman Qasim; Jill L Ostrem; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Marta San Luciano; Sarah S Wang; Nathan Ziman; Robin Taylor; Philip A Starr Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Simeng Zhang; Allison T Connolly; Lauren R Madden; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Chioma Anidi; Johanna J O'Day; Ross W Anderson; Muhammad Furqan Afzal; Judy Syrkin-Nikolau; Anca Velisar; Helen M Bronte-Stewart Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Ilknur Telkes; Ashwin Viswanathan; Joohi Jimenez-Shahed; Aviva Abosch; Musa Ozturk; Akshay Gupte; Joseph Jankovic; Nuri F Ince Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Luke A Johnson; Shane D Nebeck; Abirami Muralidharan; Matthew D Johnson; Kenneth B Baker; Jerrold L Vitek Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Claudia M Hendrix; Brett A Campbell; Benjamin J Tittle; Luke A Johnson; Kenneth B Baker; Matthew D Johnson; Gregory F Molnar; Jerrold L Vitek Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: AnneMarie K Brinda; Alex M Doyle; Madeline Blumenfeld; Jordan Krieg; Joseph S R Alisch; Chelsea Spencer; Emily Lecy; Lucius K Wilmerding; Adele DeNicola; Luke A Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.379