| Literature DB >> 26468985 |
Elisa Baldelli1,2, Guido Bellezza3, Eric B Haura4, Lucio Crinó2, W Douglas Cress4, Jianghong Deng1, Vienna Ludovini2, Angelo Sidoni3, Matthew B Schabath4, Francesco Puma5, Jacopo Vannucci5, Annamaria Siggillino2, Lance A Liotta1, Emanuel F Petricoin1, Mariaelena Pierobon1.
Abstract
Little is known about the complex signaling architecture of KRAS and the interconnected RAS-driven protein-protein interactions, especially as it occurs in human clinical specimens. This study explored the activated and interconnected signaling network of KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinomas (AD) to identify novel therapeutic targets.Thirty-four KRAS mutant (MT) and twenty-four KRAS wild-type (WT) frozen biospecimens were obtained from surgically treated lung ADs. Samples were subjected to Laser Capture Microdissection and Reverse Phase Protein Microarray analysis to explore the expression/activation levels of 150 signaling proteins along with co-activation concordance mapping. An independent set of 90 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) was used to validate selected findings by immunohistochemistry (IHC).Compared to KRAS WT tumors, the signaling architecture of KRAS MT ADs revealed significant interactions between KRAS downstream substrates, the AKT/mTOR pathway, and a number of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RTK). Approximately one-third of the KRAS MT tumors had ERK activation greater than the WT counterpart (p<0.01). Notably 18% of the KRAS MT tumors had elevated activation of the Estrogen Receptor alpha (ER-α) (p=0.02).This finding was verified in an independent population by IHC (p=0.03).KRAS MT lung ADs appear to have a more intricate RAS linked signaling network than WT tumors with linkage to many RTKs and to the AKT-mTOR pathway. Combination therapy targeting different nodes of this network may be necessary to treat this group of patients. In addition, for patients with KRAS MT tumors and activation of the ER-α, anti-estrogen therapy may have important clinical implications.Entities:
Keywords: KRAS mutation; laser capture microdissection; non-small cell lung cancers; reverse phase protein microarray; signaling networks
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26468985 PMCID: PMC4741699 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients analyzed by RPPA (Panel A) and by IHC (Panel B)
| Panel A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | ||||
| 69.4 (48-90) | 67.5 (51-88) | 72.0 (48-90) | 0.1 | |
| Male | 29 (50.0) | 21 (61.8) | 8 (33.3) | 0.03 |
| Female | 29 (50.0) | 13 (38.2) | 16 (66.7) | |
| IA | 15 (25.9) | 9 (26.5) | 6 (25.0) | 0.26 |
| IB | 19 (32.8) | 11 (32.4) | 8 (33.3) | |
| IIA | 3 (5.2) | 1 (2.9) | 2 (8.3) | |
| IIB | 8 (13.8) | 3 (8.8) | 5 (20.8) | |
| IIIA | 10 (17.2) | 9 (26.5) | 1 (4.2) | |
| IIIB | 2 (3.4) | 1 (2.9) | 1 (4.2) | |
| IV | 1 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.2) | |
Figure 1Correlation analysis of KRAS downstream substrates (activated c-Raf, Mek 1/2 and ERK 1/2) and expression/activation levels of 145 endpoints analyzed
Only correlations with p < 0.0003 are shown.
Analytes found to be statistically different between KRAS MT and KRAS WT tumors
The right column shows the trend in KRAS MT group compared to the WT.
| Endpoints statistically different | Statistical Test | Trend in MT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMPKα1 (S485) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | 0.04 | ↑ |
| eIF2α (S51) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | 0.04 | ↓ |
| Elk-1 (S383) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | <0.01 | ↑ |
| ERK 1/2 (T202/Y204) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | <0.01 | ↑ |
| Estrogen Receptor α (S118) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | 0.02 | ↑ |
| GRB2 | Two Sample t-test | <0.01 | ↓ |
| IRS-1 (S612) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | 0.04 | ↑ |
| p70S6Kinase (T412) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | <0.01 | ↑ |
| p90RSK (S380) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | <0.01 | ↑ |
| Smad2 (S245/250/255) | Wilcoxon rank sum test | 0.05 | ↑ |
| Survivin | Two Sample t-test | 0.04 | ↓ |
Figure 2Panel A: Representation of selected proteins that were significantly higher in KRAS MT tumors Panel B: Scatter plots of RPPA intensity values with mean and standard error of mean.
Figure 3Example of ER-α S118 staining by IHC (x400 magnification)
Panel A, B, C, and D show no activation, weak activation (1+), moderate activation (2+), and strong activation (3+) respectively. Panel E shows activation of ER-α S118 in the adenocarcinoma component of the sample with mixed adeno-squamous histology.
Distribution of IHC intensity values across the 90 samples analyzed
P values were calculated using Pearson's Chi-square test.
| Intensity value | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
| 0 | 18 (39.1) | 16 (36.4) | 34 | 0.034 |
| + | 8 (17.4) | 15 (34.0) | 23 | |
| ++ | 11 (24.0) | 12 (27.3) | 23 | |
| +++ | 9 (19.5) | 1 (2.3) | 10 |