Literature DB >> 2646871

Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients: evaluation with plain film, 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, and MR imaging.

W T Yuh1, J D Corson, H M Baraniewski, K Rezai, A R Shamma, M H Kathol, Y Sato, G Y el-Khoury, D R Hawes, C E Platz.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients may be difficult because of the coexistence of chronic cellulitis, vascular insufficiency, and peripheral neuropathy. This study compared the diagnostic accuracies of plain films, bone scans, and MR imaging studies in diabetic patients with suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot. Twenty-nine plain radiographs, 20 bone scans, and 30 MR studies were obtained in 24 patients. Twenty-nine bones from 14 patients were pathologically proved either positive (25 bones) or negative (four bones) for osteomyelitis. Another 15 bones (10 patients) studied with MR had no pathologic proof, but the bones healed with only local wound care and/or a short course of oral antibiotics. These patients had trauma, cellulitis, or unhealed ulcers. The sensitivity and specificity of plain films were both 75%. Bone scans had a very low specificity (100% false-positive rate). A negative bone scan should strongly exclude the probability of osteomyelitis. Unlike the findings in previous reports, MR had much higher sensitivity and specificity than bone scans in detecting osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. When the 10 patients without pathologic proof (those who presumably had neuroarthropathy, vascular insufficiency, and/or cellulitis) were included, the sensitivity and specificity of all three techniques decreased. Our experience with this small group of patients suggests that MR is a useful imaging technique for diagnosing osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2646871     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.4.795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  20 in total

Review 1.  The hallux sesamoids revisited.

Authors:  H G Potter; H Pavlov; T G Abrahams
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Is there a role for imaging in the management of patients with diabetic foot?

Authors:  Vartan M Vartanians; Adolf W Karchmer; John M Giurini; Daniel I Rosenthal
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of diabetic foot complications.

Authors:  Keynes T A Low; Wilfred C G Peh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Prognostic value of the clinical examination of the diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  D Edelman; D M Hough; K N Glazebrook; E Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Beyond ulcers and osteomyelitis: imaging of less common musculoskeletal complications in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Anuradha Rao; Girish Gandikota
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Diabetic Foot Infections: an Update in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Pinelopi Grigoropoulou; Ioanna Eleftheriadou; Edward B Jude; Nikolaos Tentolouris
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Understanding diabetic foot.

Authors:  Sharad P Pendsey
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2010-04

8.  Validating the probe-to-bone test and other tests for diagnosing chronic osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Rosario Morales Lozano; Maria L González Fernández; David Martinez Hernández; Juan V Beneit Montesinos; Sagrario Guisado Jiménez; Maximo A Gonzalez Jurado
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging features of fractures using the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence: correlation with radiographic findings.

Authors:  S P Meyers; S N Wiener
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infectious processes.

Authors:  K L Hopkins; K C Li; G Bergman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.