| Literature DB >> 26468332 |
Fadoua Gannar1, Antonio Cabrera de León2, Buenaventura Brito Díaz2, María Del Cristo Rodríguez Pérez2, Itahisa Marcelino Rodríguez2, Fatma Ben Dahmen3, Mohsen Sakly1, Nabil Attia1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) in developing countries. It has been shown the relationship between social class and MS in developed countries. The objective of our study was to compare the association of social class with the prevalence of MS in a developing country (Tunisia, region of Cap-Bon) and a developed one (Spain, Canary Islands).Entities:
Keywords: Islanders; Metabolic syndrome; Social class; Tunisian population
Year: 2015 PMID: 26468332 PMCID: PMC4605077 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-015-0084-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Distribution (%) of the studied variables by gender in both populations
| Tunisian (n = 393) | Canarian (n = 6729) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 174) | Women (n = 219) |
| Men (n = 2913) | Women (n = 3816) |
| |
| MS | 38.5 | 50.0 | 0.031 | 31.8 | 29.0 | 0.011 |
| Abdominal obesity | 47.1 | 92.7 | <0.001 | 53.2 | 65.3 | <0.001 |
| Hyperglycemia | 6.9 | 6.8 | 0.985 | 6.3 | 3.0 | <0.001 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 32.7 | 32.4 | 0.943 | 32.1 | 18.5 | <0.001 |
| Low HDL-c | 76.7 | 82.5 | 0.227 | 28.8 | 38.1 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 59.6 | 42.7 | 0.001 | 58.5 | 44.2 | <0.001 |
| Age ≤34 years | 17.2 | 17.4 | 0.003 | 28.7 | 29.4 | 0.816 |
| Age 35–64 years | 51.1 | 65.3 | 68.3 | 67.6 | ||
| Age ≥65 years | 31.6 | 17.4 | 3.1 | 3.0 | ||
| ICE1 | 26.1 | 25.2 | 0.606 | 25.4 | 20.3 | <0.001 |
| ICE2 | 18.1 | 17.2 | 22.9 | 26.1 | ||
| ICE3 | 20.3 | 17.8 | 15.7 | 18.6 | ||
| ICE4 | 21.7 | 19.0 | 20.5 | 19.2 | ||
| ICE5 | 13.8 | 20.9 | 15.5 | 15.8 | ||
MS metabolic syndrome, HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Distribution (%) of the MS by gender, according to the quintiles of social class in the Tunisian and Canarian populations
| Tunisian (n = 393) | Canarian (n = 6729) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | P | Men | Women | P | ||
| ICE1 | MS | 30.3 | 62.9 | 0.007 | 35.9 | 39.7 | 0.138 |
| ICE2 | MS | 30.4 | 60.9 | 0.038 | 37.7 | 34.7 | 0.232 |
| ICE3 | MS | 45.5 | 42.3 | 0.827 | 32.0 | 31.7 | 0.905 |
| ICE4 | MS | 40.0 | 37.0 | 0.826 | 27.3 | 19.7 | 0.001 |
| ICE5 | MS | 35.3 | 32.1 | 0.828 | 21.9 | 13.2 | <0.001 |
MS metabolic syndrome, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Logistic regression model to adjust by age the relationship of social class with MS and its criteria in the Tunisian men
| Dependent variables | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Abdominal obesity | Hyperglycemia | Low HDL-c | Hypertrigliceridemia | Hypertension | |
| Age (years) | 1.05 (1.02–1.08) | 1.04 (1.01–1.06) | 1.04 (0.99–1.09) | 0.99 (0.95–1.02) | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 1.04 (1.01–1.06) |
| ICE1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ICE2 | 1.48 (0.44–5.01) | 1.15 (0.38–3.48) | 0.89 (0.14–5.51) | 0.89 (0.17–4.54) | 1.17 (0.34–4.01) | 1.66 (0.53–5.17) |
| ICE3 | 3.41 (0.99–11.72) | 3.81 (1.27–11.43) | 0.43 (0.04–4.30) | 0.66 (0.12–3.50) | 1.95 (0.61–6.27) | 1.62 (0.54–4.87) |
| ICE4 | 3.88 (1.05–14.27) | 2.39 (0.77–7.38) | 2.31 (0.43–12.39) | 0.38 (0.07–1.91) | 1.91 (0.57–6.42) | 1.58 (0.51–4.90) |
| ICE5 | 2.50 (0.64–9.81) | 2.94 (0.87–9.91) | 0.00 (0) | 1.11 (0.16–7.77) | 3.71 (1.05–13.12) | 1.13 (0.34–3.71) |
MS metabolic syndrome, HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Logistic regression model to adjust by age the relationship of social class with the MS and its criteria in the Tunisian women
| Dependent variables | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Abdominal obesity | Hyperglycemia | Low HDL-c | Hypertrigliceridemia | Hypertension | |
| Age (years) | 1.08 (1.04–1.11) | 1.06 (1.01–1.11) | 1.05 (0.98–1.11) | 1.02 (0.98–1.06) | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 1.08 (1.04–1.11) |
| ICE1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ICE2 | 1.94 (0.56–6.74) | 2.29 (0.18–28.68) | 1.11 (0.17–7.28) | 1.07 (0.21–5.40) | 1.75 (0.63–4.90) | 1.25 (0.40–3.90) |
| ICE3 | 1.63 (0.45–5.85) | 1.05 (0.15–7.57) | 2.58 (0.35–19.09) | 1.87 (0.35–9.95) | 1.25 (0.40–3.85) | 0.39 (0.11–1.38) |
| ICE4 | 1.32 (0.36–4.77) | 1.38 (0.18–10.42) | 0.00 (0) | 0.57 (0.14–2.38) | 1.04 (0.33–3.30) | 0.93 (0.27–1.18) |
| ICE5 | 1.15 (0.31–4.26) | 1.06 (0.16–7.17) | 1.52 (0.17–13.60) | 1.21 (0.26–5.56) | 0.66 (0.20–2.20) | 0.47 (0.13–1.64) |
MS metabolic syndrome, HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Logistic regression models to adjust by age the relationship of social class with the MS and its criteria in the Canarian men
| Dependent variables | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Abdominal obesity | Hyperglycemia | Low HDL-c | Hypertrigliceridemia | Hypertension | |
| Age (years) | 1.05 (1.04–1.06) | 1.06 (1.05–1.07) | 1.06 (1.05–1.07) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 1.03 (1.02–1.03) | 1.06 (1.05–1.06) |
| ICE1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ICE2 | 1.08 (0.86–1.37) | 0.78 (0.62–0.99) | 0.75 (0.50–1.13) | 1.00 (0.79–1.27) | 1.01 (0.81–1.27) | 1.11 (0.88–1.41) |
| ICE3 | 1.14 (0.87–1.49) | 0.91 (0.70–1.18) | 1.04 (0.65–1.66) | 1.05 (0.81–1.37) | 1.07 (0.82–1.38) | 0.99 (0.76–1.28) |
| ICE4 | 0.93 (0.72–1.20) | 0.80 (0.63–1.02) | 0.87 (0.55–1.37) | 0.91 (0.71–1.17) | 0.87 (0.68–1.12) | 1.01 (0.80–1.29) |
| ICE5 | 0.67 (0.51–0.90) | 0.60 (0.47–0.78) | 0.21 (0.09–0.50) | 0.92 (0.70–1.21) | 0.80 (0.61–1.04) | 1.10 (0.85–1.42) |
MS metabolic syndrome, HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Logistic regression models to adjust by age the relationship of social class with the MS and its criteria in the Canarian women
| Dependent variables | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Abdominal obesity | Hyperglycemia | Low HDL-c | Hypertrigliceridemia | Hypertension | |
| Age (years) | 1.09 (1.08–1.09) | 1.07 (1.07–1.08) | 1.07 (1.05–1.09) | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 1.04 (1.04–1.05) | 1.09 (1.09–1.10) |
| ICE1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ICE2 | 0.72 (0.58–0.90) | 0.88 (0.69–1.13) | 0.78 (0.47–1.28) | 0.80 (0.66–0.98) | 0.84 (0.66–1.06) | 0.84 (0.67–1.04) |
| ICE3 | 0.80 (0.63–1.02) | 0.89 (0.69–1.15) | 0.56 (0.30–1.05) | 0.72 (0.58–0.89) | 0.92 (0.71–1.20) | 1.08 (0.85–1.37) |
| ICE4 | 0.65 (0.50–0.85) | 0.55 (0.43–0.71) | 0.79 (0.41–1.52) | 0.74 (0.59–0.92) | 0.76 (0.57–1.01) | 0.77 (0.60–0.99) |
| ICE5 | 0.39 (0.29–0.53) | 0.30 (0.23–0.39) | 0.49 (0.21–1.13) | 0.45 (0.35–0.57) | 0.55 (0.40–0.77) | 0.50 (0.38–0.65) |
MS metabolic syndrome, HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol, ICE1, ICE2, ICE3, ICE4, ICE5 quintiles of social class
Fig. 1Age adjusted risk (OR) of MS in each quintile of social class for women and men from Cap Bon-region of Tunisia and Canary Islands-Spain