I W M van Uden1, A M Tuladhar1, H M van der Holst1, E M C van Leijsen1, A G W van Norden2, K F de Laat3, L C A Rutten-Jacobs4, D G Norris5,6, J A H R Claassen7, E J van Dijk1, R P C Kessels7,8, F-E de Leeuw1. 1. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Neurology, Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurology, HagaZiekenhuis Den Haag, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 6. Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45141, Germany. 7. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Geriatrics, The Netherlands. 8. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Psychology, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cerebral small vessel disease is one of the most important risk factors for dementia, and has been related to hippocampal atrophy, which is among the first observed changes on conventional MRI in patients with dementia. However, these volumetric changes might be preceded by loss of microstructural integrity of the hippocampus for which conventional MRI is not sensitive enough. Therefore, we investigated the relation between the hippocampal diffusion parameters and the risk of incident dementia, using diffusion tensor imaging, independent of hippocampal volume. METHODS: The RUNDMC study is a prospective study among 503 elderly with small vessel disease, without dementia, with 5 years follow-up in 2012 (99.6% response-rate). Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios for dementia, of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity within the hippocampus, adjusted for demographics, hippocampal volume, and white matter. This was repeated in participants without evident hippocampal volume loss, because in these participants the visible damage might not yet have already started, whereas damage might have started on a microstructural level. RESULTS: 43 participants developed dementia (8.6%), resulting in a 5.5-year cumulative risk of 11.1% (95%CI 7.7-14.6). Higher mean diffusivity was associated with an increased 5-year risk of dementia. In the subgroup of participants with the upper half hippocampal volume, higher hippocampal mean diffusivity, more than doubled the 5-year risk of dementia. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study showing a relation between a higher baseline hippocampal mean diffusivity and the risk of incident dementia in elderly with small vessel disease at 5-year follow-up, independent of hippocampal volume and white matter volume.
INTRODUCTION:Cerebral small vessel disease is one of the most important risk factors for dementia, and has been related to hippocampal atrophy, which is among the first observed changes on conventional MRI in patients with dementia. However, these volumetric changes might be preceded by loss of microstructural integrity of the hippocampus for which conventional MRI is not sensitive enough. Therefore, we investigated the relation between the hippocampal diffusion parameters and the risk of incident dementia, using diffusion tensor imaging, independent of hippocampal volume. METHODS: The RUNDMC study is a prospective study among 503 elderly with small vessel disease, without dementia, with 5 years follow-up in 2012 (99.6% response-rate). Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios for dementia, of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity within the hippocampus, adjusted for demographics, hippocampal volume, and white matter. This was repeated in participants without evident hippocampal volume loss, because in these participants the visible damage might not yet have already started, whereas damage might have started on a microstructural level. RESULTS: 43 participants developed dementia (8.6%), resulting in a 5.5-year cumulative risk of 11.1% (95%CI 7.7-14.6). Higher mean diffusivity was associated with an increased 5-year risk of dementia. In the subgroup of participants with the upper half hippocampal volume, higher hippocampal mean diffusivity, more than doubled the 5-year risk of dementia. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study showing a relation between a higher baseline hippocampal mean diffusivity and the risk of incident dementia in elderly with small vessel disease at 5-year follow-up, independent of hippocampal volume and white matter volume.
Authors: Ingeborg W M van Uden; Anil M Tuladhar; Karlijn F de Laat; Anouk G W van Norden; David G Norris; Ewoud J van Dijk; Indira Tendolkar; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-19 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anouk G W van Norden; Karlijn F de Laat; Ilma Fick; Inge W M van Uden; Lucas J B van Oudheusden; Rob A R Gons; David G Norris; Marcel P Zwiers; Roy P C Kessels; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-03-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; E Achten; M Oudkerk; L M Ramos; R Heijboer; A Hofman; J Jolles; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Paulo R Dellani; Dirk Greverus; Armin Scheurich; Peter Stoeter; Matthias J Müller Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Esther M C van Leijsen; Ingeborg W M van Uden; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Mayra I Bergkamp; Valerie Lohner; Eline C M Kooijmans; Helena M van der Holst; Anil M Tuladhar; David G Norris; Ewoud J van Dijk; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Bram Platel; Catharina J M Klijn; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Iain D Croall; Valerie Lohner; Barry Moynihan; Usman Khan; Ahamad Hassan; John T O'Brien; Robin G Morris; Daniel J Tozer; Victoria C Cambridge; Kirsty Harkness; David J Werring; Andrew M Blamire; Gary A Ford; Thomas R Barrick; Hugh S Markus Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Jonathan Tay; Anil M Tuladhar; Matthew J Hollocks; Rebecca L Brookes; Daniel J Tozer; Thomas R Barrick; Masud Husain; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Hugh S Markus Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Esther M C van Leijsen; Ingeborg W M van Uden; Mayra I Bergkamp; Helena M van der Holst; David G Norris; Jurgen A H R Claassen; Roy P C Kessels; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Anil M Tuladhar Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Marco Egle; Saima Hilal; Anil M Tuladhar; Lukas Pirpamer; Steven Bell; Edith Hofer; Marco Duering; James Wason; Robin G Morris; Martin Dichgans; Reinhold Schmidt; Daniel J Tozer; Thomas R Barrick; Christopher Chen; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Hugh S Markus Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Mara Ten Kate; Silvia Ingala; Adam J Schwarz; Nick C Fox; Gaël Chételat; Bart N M van Berckel; Michael Ewers; Christopher Foley; Juan Domingo Gispert; Derek Hill; Michael C Irizarry; Adriaan A Lammertsma; José Luis Molinuevo; Craig Ritchie; Philip Scheltens; Mark E Schmidt; Pieter Jelle Visser; Adam Waldman; Joanna Wardlaw; Sven Haller; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 6.982