A Freiberg1, U Euler2, M Girbig2, A Nienhaus3,4, S Freitag4, A Seidler2. 1. Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Alice.Freiberg@tu-dresden.de. 2. Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. 3. Institute for Health Service Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Clinics Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Occupational Health Research, German Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Health and Welfare Service, Pappelallee 33-37, 22089, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient handling increases the risk of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases among healthcare workers. Thus, the use of small aids for patient handling is recommended. Small aids are non-electrical and handy assistive devices that support caregivers during patient handling. To date, there is no evidence about the clinical efficacy of small aids. Hence, the objective of this systematic review was to systematically analyze whether the use of small aids during patient handling leads to a decreased occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out. The review process was done independently by two reviewers. Methodology was assessed with the "Downs and Black checklist" and the "Risk of Bias tool." Quality of evidence was determined with the GRADE method. RESULTS: One randomized and two non-randomized trials were included. Three comparisons of intervention assessing the lumbar spine and shoulder joint were investigated. A statistically significant improvement of the 7-day prevalence of low back pain and shoulder pain was achieved within the intervention group over time of questionable clinical importance in a study with comparisons made between small aids and usual practice or mechanical aids. No comparison between the intervention group and control group at follow-up was made. Each trial showed an insufficient methodology and a high risk of bias. Quality of evidence was low for disability scores and very low for pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no convincing evidence (from low-quality studies) for the preventability of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases by the use of small aids. The literature also lacks evidence for the opposite. Generalizability of the study results is further debatable due to the different populations and settings that were investigated. Robust, high-quality intervention studies are necessary to clarify the clinical efficacy of small aids in healthcare work. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42014009767.
PURPOSE:Patient handling increases the risk of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases among healthcare workers. Thus, the use of small aids for patient handling is recommended. Small aids are non-electrical and handy assistive devices that support caregivers during patient handling. To date, there is no evidence about the clinical efficacy of small aids. Hence, the objective of this systematic review was to systematically analyze whether the use of small aids during patient handling leads to a decreased occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out. The review process was done independently by two reviewers. Methodology was assessed with the "Downs and Black checklist" and the "Risk of Bias tool." Quality of evidence was determined with the GRADE method. RESULTS: One randomized and two non-randomized trials were included. Three comparisons of intervention assessing the lumbar spine and shoulder joint were investigated. A statistically significant improvement of the 7-day prevalence of low back pain and shoulder pain was achieved within the intervention group over time of questionable clinical importance in a study with comparisons made between small aids and usual practice or mechanical aids. No comparison between the intervention group and control group at follow-up was made. Each trial showed an insufficient methodology and a high risk of bias. Quality of evidence was low for disability scores and very low for pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no convincing evidence (from low-quality studies) for the preventability of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases by the use of small aids. The literature also lacks evidence for the opposite. Generalizability of the study results is further debatable due to the different populations and settings that were investigated. Robust, high-quality intervention studies are necessary to clarify the clinical efficacy of small aids in healthcare work. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42014009767.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ergonomics; Healthcare worker; Musculoskeletal; Small aids; Systematic review
Authors: Jessica M Tullar; Shelley Brewer; Benjamin C Amick; Emma Irvin; Quenby Mahood; Lisa A Pompeii; Anna Wang; Dwayne Van Eerd; David Gimeno; Bradley Evanoff Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2010-06
Authors: Bolanle M S Tinubu; Chidozie E Mbada; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Ayodele A Fabunmi Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: P Paul Fm Kuijer; Jos Ham Verbeek; Bart Visser; Leo Am Elders; Nico Van Roden; Marion Er Van den Wittenboer; Marian Lebbink; Alex Burdorf; Carel Tj Hulshof Journal: Ann Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-06-24
Authors: Klemen Širok; Mojca Stubelj; Matej Voglar; Denisa Manojlović; Darinka Radoja; Suzana Laporšek; Matija Vodopivec; Ana Arzenšek; Natalija Rozman; Mirna Macur; Katja Pesjak; Simona Perčič Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Janice Hegewald; Wera Berge; Philipp Heinrich; Ronny Staudte; Alice Freiberg; Julia Scharfe; Maria Girbig; Albert Nienhaus; Andreas Seidler Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bianca Kusma; Aki Pietsch; Helge Riepenhof; Sören Haß; Daniel Kuhn; Klaus Fischer; Albert Nienhaus Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.646