Wassim Aldebeyan1, Antony Liddell2, Thomas Steffen3, Lorne Beckman3, Paul A Martineau1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. antony.liddell@outlook.com. 3. Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This is the first biomechanical study to examine the potential stress riser effect of the tibial tunnel or tunnels after ACL reconstruction surgery. In keeping with literature, the primary hypothesis tested in this study was that the tibial tunnel acts as a stress riser for fracture propagation. Secondary hypotheses were that the stress riser effect increases with the size of the tunnel (8 vs. 10 mm), the orientation of the tunnel [standard (STT) vs. modified transtibial (MTT)], and with the number of tunnels (1 vs. 2). METHODS: Tibial tunnels simulating both single bundle hamstring graft (8 mm) and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (10 mm) either STT or MTT position, as well as tunnels simulating double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction (7, 6 mm), were drilled in fourth-generation saw bones. These five experimental groups and a control group consisting of native saw bones without tunnels were loaded to failure on a Materials Testing System to simulate tibial plateau fracture. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in peak load to failure between any of the groups, including the control group. The fracture occurred through the tibial tunnel in 100 % of the MTT tunnels (8 and 10 mm) and 80 % of the DB tunnels specimens; however, the fractures never (0 %) occurred through the tibial tunnel of the standard tunnels (8 or 10 mm) (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In the biomechanical model, the tibial tunnel does not appear to be a stress riser for fracture propagation, despite suggestions to the contrary in the literature. Use of a standard, more vertical tunnel decreases the risk of ACL graft compromise in the event of a fracture. This may help to inform surgical decision making on ACL reconstruction technique.
PURPOSE: This is the first biomechanical study to examine the potential stress riser effect of the tibial tunnel or tunnels after ACL reconstruction surgery. In keeping with literature, the primary hypothesis tested in this study was that the tibial tunnel acts as a stress riser for fracture propagation. Secondary hypotheses were that the stress riser effect increases with the size of the tunnel (8 vs. 10 mm), the orientation of the tunnel [standard (STT) vs. modified transtibial (MTT)], and with the number of tunnels (1 vs. 2). METHODS: Tibial tunnels simulating both single bundle hamstring graft (8 mm) and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (10 mm) either STT or MTT position, as well as tunnels simulating double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction (7, 6 mm), were drilled in fourth-generation saw bones. These five experimental groups and a control group consisting of native saw bones without tunnels were loaded to failure on a Materials Testing System to simulate tibial plateau fracture. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in peak load to failure between any of the groups, including the control group. The fracture occurred through the tibial tunnel in 100 % of the MTT tunnels (8 and 10 mm) and 80 % of the DB tunnels specimens; however, the fractures never (0 %) occurred through the tibial tunnel of the standard tunnels (8 or 10 mm) (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In the biomechanical model, the tibial tunnel does not appear to be a stress riser for fracture propagation, despite suggestions to the contrary in the literature. Use of a standard, more vertical tunnel decreases the risk of ACL graft compromise in the event of a fracture. This may help to inform surgical decision making on ACL reconstruction technique.
Authors: Hans Van der Bracht; Luk Verhelst; Yannick Goubau; Steffen Fieuws; Peter Verdonk; Johan Bellemans Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Felix Dyrna; Celso Cruz Timm de Oliveira; Michael Nowak; Andreas Voss; Elifho Obopilwe; Sepp Braun; Leo Pauzenberger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240