Literature DB >> 26467657

Women's Suggestions for Improving Midwifery Care in The Netherlands.

Carien I Baas1, Jan Jaap H M Erwich2, Therese A Wiegers3, T Paul de Cock4, Eileen K Hutton4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The experience of the care a woman receives during pregnancy and childbirth has an immediate and long-lasting effect on her well being. The involvement of patients and clients in health care has increased over the last decades. The Dutch maternity care system offers an excellent opportunity to explore and involve women's suggestions for the improvement of midwifery care in the current maternity care model.
METHODS: This qualitative study is part of the "DELIVER" study. Clients were recruited from 20 midwifery practices. Purposive sampling was used to select the practices. The clients received up to three questionnaires, in which they could respond to the question; "Do you have any suggestions on how your midwife could improve his/her provision of care?" The answers were analyzed with a qualitative thematic content analysis, using the software program MAXQDA.
RESULTS: Altogether, 3,499 answers were provided. One overarching concept emerged: clients' desire for individualized care. Within this concept, suggestions could be clustered around 1) provider characteristics: interpersonal skills, communication, and competence, and 2) service characteristics: content and quantity of care, guidance and support, continuity of care provider, continuity of care, information, and coordination of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Informed by the suggestions of women, care to women and their families could be improved by the following: 1) more continuity of the care provider during the prenatal, natal, and postnatal periods, 2) more information and information specifically tailored for the person, 3) client-centered communication, and 4) a personal approach with 5) enough time spent per client.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  midwifery care; women's experiences; women-centered care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467657     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  5 in total

1.  Experiences and wishes of women regarding systemic aspects of midwifery care in Germany: a qualitative study with focus groups.

Authors:  Elke Mattern; Susanne Lohmann; Gertrud M Ayerle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Through the client's eyes: using narratives to explore experiences of care transfers during pregnancy, childbirth, and the neonatal period.

Authors:  Cherelle M V van Stenus; Mark Gotink; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Anneke Sools; Ariana Need
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality.

Authors:  Maaike Vogels-Broeke; Darie Daemers; Luc Budé; Raymond de Vries; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Hilde Perdok; Suze Jans; Corine Verhoeven; Lidewij Henneman; Therese Wiegers; Ben Willem Mol; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Women suffer more from disrespectful and abusive care than from the labour pain itself: a qualitative study from Women's perspective.

Authors:  Mengistu Welday Gebremichael; Alemayehu Worku; Araya Abrha Medhanyie; Kerstin Edin; Yemane Berhane
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.