Literature DB >> 26467401

Lead extractions: the Zwolle experience with the Evolution mechanical sheath.

Peter Paul H M Delnoy1, Olivier A Witte2, Ahmet Adiyaman2, Abdul Ghani2, Jaap Jan J Smit2, Anand R Ramdat Misier2, Arif Elvan2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Evolution sheath (Cook, USA) is a power sheath with a cutting screw tip operated by mechanical rotation. It has been reported to be an effective tool for chronic lead extraction. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this system. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From 2009 to 2014, all lead extractions requiring the use of an Evolution sheath were prospectively examined. In 77 patients, 111 leads were extracted. The first 57 leads were extracted with the original unidirectional sheath, and since 2013, 54 leads were extracted with the bidirectional R/L type. According to the current guidelines, complete procedural success was defined as the removal of all targeted lead material. Clinical success was the retention of a small portion of the lead, and failure was the inability to achieve either complete procedural or clinical success or the development of any permanently disabling complication. The Evolution sheath was used to extract 111 leads in 77 patients. The median age of the lead at time of extraction was 8.0 years (median 6.9, interquartile range 6.4, minimum: 0.6 and maximum: 34.4), with a clinical success rate of 98% and a complete procedural success of 88%. Complete procedural success was higher for the R/L type Evolution sheath (96 vs. 80%, P = 0.006). There were 21 (19%) implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads, 22 (20%) right ventricular pacing leads, 60 (54%) right atrial leads, and 8 (7%) left ventricular leads. There were no major complications and six (8%) minor complications. There was no need for the usage of a femoral tool or snares.
CONCLUSION: Use of Evolution for lead extractions seems to be safe and effective, with a high clinical success rate. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead extraction; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467401     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Sofia Metaxa; Spyridon Koulouris; Dimitris Tsiachris
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Results of the Patient-Related Outcomes of Mechanical lead Extraction Techniques (PROMET) study: a multicentre retrospective study on advanced mechanical lead extraction techniques.

Authors:  Christoph T Starck; Elkin Gonzalez; Omar Al-Razzo; Patrizio Mazzone; Peter-Paul Delnoy; Alexander Breitenstein; Jan Steffel; Jürgen Eulert-Grehn; Pia Lanmüller; Francesco Melillo; Alessandra Marzi; Manav Sohal; Giulia Domenichini; Mark M Gallagher
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Comparison between laser sheaths, femoral approach and rotating mechanical sheaths for lead extraction.

Authors:  F A Bracke; N Rademakers; N Verberkmoes; M Van 't Veer; B M van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.854

4.  Performance and outcomes of transvenous rotational lead extraction: Results from a prospective, monitored, international clinical study.

Authors:  Saumya Sharma; Byron K Lee; Anuj Garg; Robert Peyton; Brian T Schuler; Pamela Mason; Peter Paul Delnoy; Mark M Gallagher; Ramesh Hariharan; Raymond Schaerf; Ruirui Du; Nina D Serratore; Christoph T Starck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.