Literature DB >> 26467024

Cartilage Repair in the Inflamed Joint: Considerations for Biological Augmentation Toward Tissue Regeneration.

Celeste Scotti1, Alberto Gobbi2, Georgios Karnatzikos2, Ivan Martin3, Kazunori Shimomura4, John G Lane5, Giuseppe Michele Peretti1,6, Norimasa Nakamura7,8.   

Abstract

Cartilage repair/regeneration procedures (e.g., microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation [ACI]) typically result in a satisfactory outcome in selected patients. However, the vast majority of patients with chronic symptoms and, in general, a more diseased joint, do not benefit from these surgical techniques. The aims of this work were to (1) review factors negatively influencing the joint environment; (2) review current adjuvant therapies that can be used to improve results of cartilage repair/regeneration procedures in patients with more diseased joints, (3) outline future lines of research and promising experimental approaches. Chronicity of symptoms and advancing patient age appear to be the most relevant factors negatively affecting clinical outcome of cartilage repair/regeneration. Preliminary experience with hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and mesenchymal stem cell has been positive but there is no strong evidence supporting the use of these products and this requires further assessment with high-quality, prospective clinical trials. The use of a Tissue Therapy strategy, based on more mature engineered tissues, holds promise to tackle limitations of standard ACI procedures. Current research has highlighted the need for more targeted therapies, and (1) induction of tolerance with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or by preventing IL-6 downregulation; (2) combined IL-4 and IL-10 local release; and (3) selective activation of the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling appear to be the most promising innovative strategies. For older patients and for those with chronic symptoms, adjuvant therapies are needed in combination with microfracture and ACI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467024     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2015.0297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  10 in total

1.  Interleukin 1β and lipopolysaccharides induction dictate chondrocyte morphological properties and reduce cellular roughness and adhesion energy comparatively.

Authors:  Alia H Mallah; Mahmoud Amr; Arda Gozen; Juana Mendenhall; Bernard J Van-Wie; Nehal I Abu-Lail
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.916

Review 2.  Native joint-resident mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Dennis McGonagle; Thomas G Baboolal; Elena Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Leukocyte-Reduced Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment of Basal Thumb Arthritis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Markus Loibl; Siegmund Lang; Lena-Marie Dendl; Michael Nerlich; Peter Angele; Sebastian Gehmert; Michaela Huber
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Advancing osteochondral tissue engineering: bone morphogenetic protein, transforming growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor signaling drive ordered differentiation of periosteal cells resulting in stable cartilage and bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  L F Mendes; H Katagiri; W L Tam; Y C Chai; L Geris; S J Roberts; F P Luyten
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration.

Authors:  Livia Roseti; Carola Cavallo; Giovanna Desando; Valentina Parisi; Mauro Petretta; Isabella Bartolotti; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Comparison of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Allogenic Human Umbilical Cord Blood Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation on Chondral Defect of Knee: Assessment of Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Dong Jin Ryu; Yoon Sang Jeon; Jun Sung Park; Gi Cheol Bae; Jeong-Seok Kim; Myung Ku Kim
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Synovial membrane-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells from osteoarthritic joints in dogs possess lower chondrogenic-, and higher osteogenic capacity compared to normal joints.

Authors:  M Teunissen; N S Ahrens; L Snel; R Narcisi; S A Kamali; G J V M van Osch; B P Meij; S C Mastbergen; K Sivasubramaniyan; M A Tryfonidou
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 8.079

8.  One-step surgery with multipotent stem cells and Hyaluronan-based scaffold for the treatment of full-thickness chondral defects of the knee in patients older than 45 years.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Celeste Scotti; Georgios Karnatzikos; Abhishek Mudhigere; Marc Castro; Giuseppe M Peretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: A Roadmap to the Clinic.

Authors:  Celeste Scotti; Alberto Gobbi; Norimasa Nakamura; Giuseppe M Peretti
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Impact of Endotoxins in Gelatine Hydrogels on Chondrogenic Differentiation and Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion In Vitro.

Authors:  Wilhelmina M G A C Groen; Lizette Utomo; Miguel Castilho; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda; P René van Weeren; Riccardo Levato; Nicoline M Korthagen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.