Literature DB >> 26466914

The magnitude of gonadotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs on ovarian follicles and granulosa cells varies depending upon the category of the drugs and the type of granulosa cells.

Aytac Yuksel1, Gamze Bildik2, Filiz Senbabaoglu2, Nazli Akin2, Macit Arvas1, Fehmi Unal3, Yagmur Kilic2, Isil Karanfil2, Baldan Eryılmaz2, Pelin Yilmaz2, Can Ozkanbaş2, Cagatay Taskiran4, Senai Aksoy5, Yılmaz Guzel5, Basak Balaban5, Umit Ince6, Akira Iwase7, Bulent Urman8, Ozgur Oktem9.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Do different chemotherapy drugs exert the same magnitude of cytotoxicity on dormant primordial follicles and the growing follicle fraction in the ovary in vivo and on mitotic non-luteinized and non-mitotic luteinized granulosa cells in vitro? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cyclophosphamide (alkylating agent) and cisplatin (alkylating like) impacted both primordial and pre-antral/antral follicles and both mitotic and non-mitotic granulosa cells, whereas the anti-metabolite cancer drug gemcitabine was detrimental only to pre-antral/antral follicles and mitotic non-luteinized granulosa cells. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is already known that anti-metabolite cancer drugs are less detrimental to the ovary than alkylating and alkylating like agents, such as cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. This assumption is largely based on the results of clinical reports showing lower rates of amenorrhea in women receiving anti-metabolite agent-based regimens compared with those treated with the protocols containing an alkylating drug or a platinum compound. But a quantitative comparison of gonadotoxicity with a histomorphometric proof of evidence has not been available for many chemotherapy drugs. Therefore, we combined in this study in vivo and in vitro models of human and rat origin that allows a comparative analysis of the impact of different chemotherapy agents on the ovary and granulosa cells using real-time quantitative cell indices, histomorphometry, steroidogenesis assays, and DNA damage and cell death/viability markers. We also aimed to investigate if there is a difference between mitotic and non-mitotic granulosa cells in terms of their sensitivity to the cytotoxic actions of chemotherapy drugs with different mechanisms of action. This issue has not been addressed previously. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This translational research study involved in vivo analyses of ovaries in rats and in vitro analyses of granulosa cells of human and rat origin. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: For the in vivo assays, 54 4- to 6-week old Sprague-Dawley young female rats were randomly allocated into four groups of 13 to receive a single IP injection of: saline (control), gemcitabine (200 mg/kg), cisplatin (50 mg/kg) or cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg). The animals were euthanized 72 h later. Follicle counts and serum AMH levels were compared between the groups. In vitro cytotoxicity studies were performed using mitotic non-luteinized rat (SIGC) and human (COV434, HGrC1) granulosa cells, and non-mitotic luteinized human (HLGC) granulosa cells. The cells were plated at a density of 5000 cells/well using DMEM-F12 culture media supplemented with 10% FBS. Chemotherapy agents were used at their therapeutic blood concentrations. The growth of mitotic granulosa cells was monitored real-time using xCelligence system. Live/dead cell and apoptosis assays were also carried out using intravital Yo-Pro-1 staining and cleaved caspase-3 expression, respectively. Estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels were assayed with ELISA. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin caused massive atresia of both primordials and growing follicles in the rat ovary whereas gemcitabine impacted pre-antral/antral follicles only. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin induced apoptosis of both mitotic non-luteinized and non-mitotic luteinized granulosa cells in vitro. By contrast, cytotoxicity of gemcitabine was confined to mitotic non-luteinized granulosa cells. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study tested only three chemotherapeutic agents. The experimental methodology described here could be applied to other drugs for detailed analysis of their ovarian cytotoxicity. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: These findings indicate that in vivo and in vitro cytotoxic actions of chemotherapy drugs on the ovarian follicles and granulosa cells vary depending upon the their mechanism of action and the nature of the granulosa cells.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cisplatin; cyclophosphamide; cytotoxicity; gemcitabine; granulosa cells; ovary

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466914     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  29 in total

1.  What Can We Learn From Menstrual Patterns After Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake; Kelly C Gast; Kathryn J Ruddy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Breast cancer: an update on treatment-related infertility.

Authors:  Erica Silvestris; Miriam Dellino; Paola Cafforio; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Gennaro Cormio; Stella D'Oronzo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The protective effect of platelet-rich plasma administrated on ovarian function in female rats with Cy-induced ovarian damage.

Authors:  Pinar Ozcan; Taha Takmaz; Olgu Enis Tok; Sevde Islek; Esra Nur Yigit; Cem Ficicioglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair.

Authors:  Jessica M Stringer; Amy Winship; Seng H Liew; Karla Hutt
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Effects of VEGF + Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet-Rich Plasma on Inbred Rat Ovarian Functions in Cyclophosphamide-Induced Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Model.

Authors:  Birol Vural; Gokhan Duruksu; Fisun Vural; Merve Gorguc; Erdal Karaoz
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  AMH/MIS as a contraceptive that protects the ovarian reserve during chemotherapy.

Authors:  Motohiro Kano; Amanda E Sosulski; LiHua Zhang; Hatice D Saatcioglu; Dan Wang; Nicholas Nagykery; Mary E Sabatini; Guangping Gao; Patricia K Donahoe; David Pépin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Clinically node-positive micropapillary bladder cancer in a young female desiring to spare functional bladder and fertility.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukushima; Fumitaka Koga; Yasukazu Nakanishi; Madoka Kataoka; Ken-Ichi Tobisu
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-04-11

8.  A Tiered Female Ovarian Toxicity Screening Identifies Toxic Effects of Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors on Murine Growing Follicles.

Authors:  Jingshan Xu; Yingzheng Wang; Alexandra E Kauffman; Yaqi Zhang; Yang Li; Jie Zhu; Kimberly Maratea; Kristin Fabre; Qiang Zhang; Teresa K Woodruff; Shuo Xiao
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Can Coenzyme Q10 supplementation protect the ovarian reserve against oxidative damage?

Authors:  Pınar Özcan; Cem Fıçıcıoğlu; Ozge Kizilkale; Mert Yesiladali; Olgu Enis Tok; Ferda Ozkan; Mukaddes Esrefoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Unraveling the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced damage to human primordial follicle reserve: road to developing therapeutics for fertility preservation and reversing ovarian aging.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Szymanska; Xiujuan Tan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.