Literature DB >> 26466911

Luminal fluid of epididymis and vas deferens contributes to sperm chromatin fragmentation.

Joanna E Gawecka1, Segal Boaz2, Kay Kasperson3, Hieu Nguyen2, Donald P Evenson4, W Steven Ward5.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Do the luminal fluids of the epididymis and the vas deferens contribute to sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) in mice? SUMMARY ANSWER: The luminal fluids of both organs are required for activating SCF in mice, but the vas deferens luminal fluid does this more efficiently than that of the epididymis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Mice sperm have the ability to degrade their DNA in an apoptotic-like fashion when treated with divalent cations in a process termed SCF. SCF has two steps: the induction of reversible double-strand DNA breaks at the nuclear matrix attachment sites, followed by the irreversible degradation of DNA by nuclease. Single stranded DNA breaks accompany SCF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Luminal fluids from two reproductive organs of the mouse (B6D2F1 strain), the epididymis and vas deferens, were extracted and tested for SCF activation with divalent cations using four different combinations of the sperm and the surrounding luminal fluids: (i) in situ--sperm were kept in their luminal fluid and activated directly; (ii) reconstituted--sperm were centrifuged and resuspended in their luminal fluid before SCF activation; (iii) mixed--sperm were centrifuged and resuspended in the luminal fluid of the other organ; (iv) no luminal fluid--sperm were centrifuged and reconstituted in buffer. All four experiments were performed without (controls) and with divalent cations (resulting in SCF). For each experimental condition, two different mice were used and the analyses averaged. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: DNA damage by SCF was analyzed by three different methods, the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) analysis and field inversion gel electrophoresis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In all three assays that we used, the vas deferens luminal fluid was much more efficient in stimulating SCF in the sperm from either source than that of the epididymis (P < 0.0001). Vas deferens sperm were capable of initiating lower levels of SCF in the absence of luminal fluid (P < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Analyses were performed in only one species, the mouse, but we used three separate assays in our analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The data suggest that the luminal fluid of the male reproductive tract interacts with sperm during their transit providing a mechanism to degrade the DNA. We hypothesize that this is part of an apoptotic-like mechanism that allows the reproductive tract to eliminate defective sperm. The SCF model also allowed us to identify differences in the types of DNA lesions that the three tests can identify, providing important background information for the use of these tests clinically.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TUNEL assay; sperm DNA damage; sperm chromatin; sperm chromatin structure assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466911      PMCID: PMC4643531          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  49 in total

1.  Ubiquitin-dependent sperm quality control mechanism recognizes spermatozoa with DNA defects as revealed by dual ubiquitin-TUNEL assay.

Authors:  Peter Sutovsky; Evelyn Neuber; Gerald Schatten
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 2.  DNA loop domain organization: the three-dimensional genomic code.

Authors:  B Sotolongo; W S Ward
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  2000

3.  The role of topoisomerase II in the excision of DNA loop domains during apoptosis.

Authors:  Victor T Solovyan; Zinayida A Bezvenyuk; Antero Salminen; Caroline A Austin; Michael J Courtney
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Characteristics of human sperm chromatin structure following an episode of influenza and high fever: a case study.

Authors:  D P Evenson; L K Jost; M Corzett; R Balhorn
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

5.  Cleavage preferences of the apoptotic endonuclease DFF40 (caspase-activated DNase or nuclease) on naked DNA and chromatin substrates.

Authors:  P Widlak; P Li; X Wang; W T Garrard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells.

Authors:  W S Ward; D S Coffey
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Effects of X-irradiation on mouse testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure.

Authors:  B L Sailer; L K Jost; K R Erickson; M A Tajiran; D P Evenson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Mouse spermatozoa contain a nuclease that is activated by pretreatment with EGTA and subsequent calcium incubation.

Authors:  Segal M Boaz; Kenneth Dominguez; Jeffrey A Shaman; W Steven Ward
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa and assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel; Eva Kierspel; Marjam Hajimohammad; Thomas Stalf; Christiaan Hoogendijk; Claas Mehnert; Roelof Menkveld; Wolf-Bernhard Schill; Thinus F Kruger
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Ability of hamster spermatozoa to digest their own DNA.

Authors:  Barbara Sotolongo; Elisabete Lino; W Steven Ward
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 4.285

View more
  9 in total

1.  Nuclear DNA Fragmentation in Boar Spermatozoa: Measurement Methods and Reproductive Performance Implications.

Authors:  Raquel Ausejo; Juan Manuel Martínez; Noelia Mendoza; Alfonso Bolarin; M Teresa Tejedor; Maria Victoria Falceto
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Could high DNA stainability (HDS) be a valuable indicator of sperm nuclear integrity?

Authors:  Z Mohammadi; M Tavalaee; P Gharagozloo; J R Drevet; M H Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2020-08-13

Review 3.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

Review 4.  Sperm DNA damage and its role in IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  Phil Vu Bach; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2016-12-05

5.  Evaluation of sperm chromatin structure and DNA strand breaks is an important part of clinical male fertility assessment.

Authors:  Donald P Evenson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

6.  Eight tests for sperm DNA fragmentation and their roles in the clinic.

Authors:  W Steven Ward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  Non-coding RNAs and chromatin: key epigenetic factors from spermatogenesis to transgenerational inheritance.

Authors:  Carolina Cheuquemán; Rodrigo Maldonado
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.612

8.  Sperm degradation after vasectomy follows a sperm chromatin fragmentation-dependent mechanism causing DNA breaks in the toroid linker regions.

Authors:  Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Hieu Nguyen; Raquel Valle; Hongwen Wu; Marc Yeste; W Steven Ward
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.518

9.  Absence of Peroxiredoxin 6 Amplifies the Effect of Oxidant Stress on Mobility and SCSA/CMA3 Defined Chromatin Quality and Impairs Fertilizing Ability of Mouse Spermatozoa.

Authors:  Burak Ozkosem; Sheldon I Feinstein; Aron B Fisher; Cristian O'Flaherty
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.