Literature DB >> 26466606

People living with psychosocial disability: Rehabilitation and recovery-informed service provision within the second Australian national survey of psychosis.

Carol Harvey1, Lisa Brophy2, Samuel Parsons3, Kristen Moeller-Saxone4, Margaret Grigg5, Dan Siskind6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: People with psychosocial disability are an important, although often neglected, subgroup of those living with severe and persistent mental illness. Rehabilitation, provided through clinical and non-government organisations in Australia, may contribute to their personal recovery goals. We hypothesised that people with psychoses with the greatest disability and complex needs would receive services from both sectors, reflecting treatment and rehabilitation needs.
METHOD: Participants in the 2010 Australian national survey of psychosis (n = 1825) were interviewed to assess demographic, functional, mental and physical health characteristics and service use in the previous year. Two subgroups were created and compared: those using services from community mental health with, and without, non-governmental organisation involvement. Group membership was predicted by hierarchical logistic regression using variables selected on a priori grounds. Usefulness of the final model was examined by calculating improvement over the rate of accuracy achievable by chance alone.
RESULTS: The model was statistically significant but fell just short of useful (criterion 71.6%, model achieved 70.6%). Four independent variables contributed uniquely to predicting whether participants received both services (never married, childhood trauma, group accommodation, poor global functioning) consistent with the hypothesis. However, severe dysfunction in socialising was less likely to predict membership of the combined services group when compared with no dysfunction (p = 0.001, odds ratio = 0.384, confidence interval = [0.218, 0.677]), as was current smoking compared with none (p = 0.001, odds ratio = 0.606, confidence interval = [0.445, 0.824]).
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest services provided by non-governmental organisations are targeted to those with the greatest disability although targeting could be improved. A subgroup of people with psychosis and severe disability in community mental health services do not access non-governmental services. Their unmet needs for rehabilitation and recovery have important implications for future development of community mental health, including the non-governmental sector. © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychosocial disability; community mental health services; non-governmental organisations; psychiatric rehabilitation; psychosis; psychosocial rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466606     DOI: 10.1177/0004867415610437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  8 in total

1.  Quantifying the size of the informal care sector for Australian adults with mental illness: caring hours and replacement cost.

Authors:  Sandra Diminic; Yong Yi Lee; Emily Hielscher; Meredith G Harris; Jan Kealton; Harvey A Whiteford
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Receipt and targeting of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people living with psychoses: findings from the second Australian national survey of psychosis.

Authors:  C Harvey; J Lewis; J Farhall
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website.

Authors:  Anne Williams; Ellie Fossey; John Farhall; Fiona Foley; Neil Thomas
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  'I'm proud of how far I've come. I'm just ready to work': mental health recovery narratives within the context of Australia's Disability Employment Services.

Authors:  Alexandra Devine; Cathy Vaughan; Anne Kavanagh; Helen Dickinson; Sean Byars; Stefanie Dimov; Bill Gye; Lisa Brophy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Self-reported needs of people living with psychotic disorders: Results from the Australian national psychosis survey.

Authors:  Christine Migliorini; Ellie Fossey; Carol Harvey
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  The meaning of social support for persons with serious mental illness: A family member perspective.

Authors:  Julie Chronister; Sandra Fitzgerald; Chih-Chin Chou
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  A Comprehensive Cohort Description and Statistical Grouping of Community-Based Residential Rehabilitation Service Users in Australia.

Authors:  Stephen Parker; Dan Siskind; Daniel F Hermens; Frances Dark; Gemma McKeon; Nicole Korman; Urska Arnautovska; Meredith Harris; Harvey Whiteford
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Childhood adversity and clinical and psychosocial outcomes in psychosis.

Authors:  S Turner; C Harvey; L Hayes; D Castle; C Galletly; S Sweeney; S Shah; L Keogh; M J Spittal
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.892

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.