| Literature DB >> 26466543 |
Abstract
Several thousand Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) including worker, nymph, soldier, neotenic and alate castes were collected from three pine logs brought into the laboratory on dates five years apart. The neotenics, all nymphoid, were divided into three groups based on the extent of cuticle pigmentation and termed regular neotenics (RN), black-headed neotenics (BHN) or black neotenics (BN). All castes, from Log A, in 2008, provided a neutral sex ratio except BHN (N = 378) and BN (N = 51) which were exclusively male while the soldiers (N = 466) were female-biased. This information suggests that there is a sex-linked bifurcation along the path for termite development with a male-biased neotenic or female-biased soldier as the choice. In contrast, termites collected in 2004 from Log B provided sex ratios that included a female biased RN (N = 1017), a neutral soldier (N = 258) and male biased BHN (N = 99) and workers (N = 54). Log C, collected in 2009, provided female biased soldiers (N = 32), RNs (N = 18) and BHNs (N = 4) and only male BN (N = 5). Eight laboratory cultures, ranging in age from five to 14 years old, also were sampled and all castes sexed. The census included a 14-year old queen-right colony, an 8-year old polyandrous colony and six colonies provided nymphs and male-biased worker populations. Together these data indicate a flexible caste determination system providing a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the flexible developmental options available in R. flavipes that we discuss relative to the literature on Reticulitermes ontogeny.Entities:
Keywords: Isoptera; life cycle; neotenic differentiation; sex ratio
Year: 2012 PMID: 26466543 PMCID: PMC4553610 DOI: 10.3390/insects3020538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Photographic representation of neotenic phenotype designations based on the extent of cuticle scleritozation. (A) Regular neotenic; (B) Black-headed neotenic; (C) Black neotenic.
List of castes collected from three logs by caste, including neotenic phenotypes, number examined and resulting sex ratio.
| Collection | Caste | ♂ (male) | ♀ (female) | Sex ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log A | Regular neotenic | 306 | 335 | 0.91 |
| Black-headed neotenic | 373 | 5 | 73.50 | |
| Black neotenic | 51 | 0 | exclusively male | |
| Soldier | 157 | 309 | 0.51 | |
| Worker | 226 | 174 | 1.30 | |
| Nymph | 155 | 200 | 0.78 | |
| Alates | 351 | 271 | 1.30 | |
| Neotenic +Soldier | 887 | 649 | 1.37 | |
| Log B | Regular neotenic | 243 | 774 | 0.31 |
| Black-headed neotenic | 94 | 5 | 15.40 | |
| Soldier | 133 | 125 | 1.06 | |
| Worker | 34 | 20 | 1.70 | |
| Neotenic +Soldier | 470 | 904 | 0.52 | |
| Log C | Regular neotenic | 4 | 14 | 0.29 |
| Black-headed neotenic | 1 | 3 | 0.33 | |
| Black neotenic | 5 | 0 | exclusively male | |
| Soldier | 11 | 21 | 0.52 | |
| Worker | 137 | 68 | 2.01 | |
| Nymph | 5 | 13 | 0.38 | |
| Neotenic +Soldier | 21 | 38 | 0.55 |
Numbers and sex ratio, by caste, of R. flavipes laboratory cultures including date of culture inception and final census.
| Collection Paired date | Caste | Date of census | ♂ (male) | ♀ (female) | Sex ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colony I | Regular neotenic | 10/10/2008 | 9 | 41 | 0.22 |
| Black-headed neotenic | 6 | 5 | 1.20 | ||
| Nymph | 8 | 9 | 0.89 | ||
| Soldier | 11 | 6 | 1.83 | ||
| Worker | 113 | 65 | 1.74 | ||
| Colony II | Regular neotenic | 10/10/2008 | 0 | 2 | exclusively female |
| Nymph | 81 | 132 | 0.61 | ||
| Soldier | 17 | 12 | 1.42 | ||
| Worker | 155 | 48 | 3.23 | ||
| Colony III | Reproductive (K, K, Q) | 12/4/2008 | 2 | 1 | 2.00 |
| Nymph | 61 | 10 | 0.87 | ||
| Soldier | 68 | 43 | 1.58 | ||
| Worker | 97 | 60 | 1.62 | ||
| Colony IV | Reproductive (K, Q) | 7/31/2008 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Nymph | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | ||
| Soldier | 33 | 46 | 0.72 | ||
| Worker | 84 | 43 | 1.95 | ||
| Colony V | Reproductive (K, Q) | 10/23/2008 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Soldier | 32 | 26 | 1.23 | ||
| Worker | 135 | 91 | 1.48 | ||
| Colony VI | Reproductive (K, Q) | 12/5/2008 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Nymph | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | ||
| Soldier | 31 | 7 | 4.43 | ||
| Worker | 82 | 33 | 2.48 | ||
| Colony VII | Reproductive (K, Q) | 6/1/2009 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Nymph | 0 | 2 | exclusively female | ||
| Soldier | 9 | 3 | 3.00 | ||
| Worker | 84 | 35 | 2.40 | ||
| Colony VIII | Reproductive (K, Q) | 6/1/2009 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Nymph | 0 | 4 | exclusively female | ||
| Soldier | 19 | 26 | 0.73 | ||
| Worker | 127 | 47 | 2.70 |
Figure 2Diagram of Reticulitermes developmental pathways modified from Buchli [15].