Literature DB >> 26466176

Practical Approaches to Quality Improvement for Radiologists.

Aine Marie Kelly1, Paul Cronin1.   

Abstract

Continuous quality improvement is a fundamental attribute of high-performing health care systems. Quality improvement is an essential component of health care, with the current emphasis on adding value. It is also a regulatory requirement, with reimbursements increasingly being linked to practice performance metrics. Practice quality improvement efforts must be demonstrated for credentialing purposes and for certification of radiologists in practice. Continuous quality improvement must occur for radiologists to remain competitive in an increasingly diverse health care market. This review provides an introduction to the main approaches available to undertake practice quality improvement, which will be useful for busy radiologists. Quality improvement plays multiple roles in radiology services, including ensuring and improving patient safety, providing a framework for implementing and improving processes to increase efficiency and reduce waste, analyzing and depicting performance data, monitoring performance and implementing change, enabling personnel assessment and development through continued education, and optimizing customer service and patient outcomes. The quality improvement approaches and underlying principles overlap, which is not surprising given that they all align with good patient care. The application of these principles to radiology practices not only benefits patients but also enhances practice performance through promotion of teamwork and achievement of goals. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466176     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

Review 1.  If Disney ran your pediatric radiology department: a different approach to improving the patient and family experience.

Authors:  Raymond W Sze; Chido D Vera; Laurie Hogan; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Implementation and Validation of PACS Integrated Peer Review for Discrepancy Recording of Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  A W Olthof; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Improvement of radiology reporting in a clinical cancer network: impact of an optimised multidisciplinary workflow.

Authors:  A W Olthof; J Borstlap; W W Roeloffzen; P M C Callenbach; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Using Quality Improvement Methodology to Reduce Costs while Improving Efficiency and Provider Satisfaction in a Busy, Academic Musculoskeletal Radiology Division.

Authors:  Steven J Baccei; Scott R Henderson; Hao S Lo; Kevin Reynolds
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Promises of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: a systematic technographic review.

Authors:  Allard W Olthof; Peter M A van Ooijen; Mohammad H Rezazade Mehrizi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Failure mode effect and criticality analysis of ultrasound device by classification tracking.

Authors:  Longchen Wang; Bin Li; Bing Hu; Guofeng Shen; Yunxin Zheng; Yuanyi Zheng
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Process improvement for reducing side discrepancies in radiology reports.

Authors:  Subba Rao Digumarthy; Rachel Vining; Azadeh Tabari; Sireesha Nandimandalam; Alexi Otrakji; JoAnne O Shepard; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2018-08-20

8.  The need for dedicated time for medical physicists practice quality improvement efforts in radiation oncology department: A commentary.

Authors:  Richard Zellars; Christopher Njeh; Scott Marquette
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.