Literature DB >> 26465928

A Randomized Trial of a Supplemental Alarm for Critically Low Systolic Blood Pressure.

Krit Panjasawatwong1, Daniel I Sessler, Wolf H Stapelfeldt, Douglas B Mayers, Edward J Mascha, Dongsheng Yang, Andrea Kurz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with complications that might be ameliorated by earlier intervention. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that a supplemental decision support alert for critically low systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases the duration of intraoperative hypotension.
METHODS: We enrolled adults having surgery and anesthetized by attending anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists under attending supervision. When invasive SBP <80 mmHg was detected for 3 consecutive minutes or any oscillometric SBP <80 mmHg, patients were randomly assigned to routine management or a visual alert and pager notification. Clinicians who received alerts were free to act on the alert or not. The primary outcome was time to return to SBP ≥ 80 mmHg. Secondary outcomes were time until SBP remained ≥ 80 mmHg for at least 10 minutes and the duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS: One thousand five hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to the hypotension alerts and 1567 to no alerts. Randomized groups did not differ on time to return to SBP ≥ 80 mmHg after the first alert, with estimated adjusted hazard ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.06; P = 0.69). The median time [quartiles] to return to SBP ≥ 80 mmHg was 1 [0, 3] minutes in each group and 1 [0, 3] minutes in the nonalert group (P = 0.69). Hospital length of stay was also similar, with the median [quartiles] lengths of stay being 2 [1, 4] days in the alert group and 2 [1,5] in the nonalert group (P = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: An additional warning for severe hypotension did not reduce the duration of hypotension or hospitalization. Decision support alerts may be more useful for more complicated situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26465928     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative myocardial injury and the contribution of hypotension.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler; Ashish K Khanna
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems.

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Jonathan M Tan; Arul M Lingappan; Jorge A Gálvez; Sherry E Morgan; Michael A Krall
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Hypotension as a marker or mediator of perioperative organ injury: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gareth L Ackland; Tom E F Abbott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 11.719

Review 4.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig R Ramsay; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

5.  The SLUScore: A Novel Method for Detecting Hazardous Hypotension in Adult Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Wolf H Stapelfeldt; Hui Yuan; Jefferson K Dryden; Kristen E Strehl; Jacek B Cywinski; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Pamela Bromley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Terminology, communication, and information systems in nonoperating room anaesthesia in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Christina A Jelly; Holly B Ende; Robert E Freundlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.733

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.