| Literature DB >> 26465158 |
Genta Sawada1, Atsushi Niida2, Hidenari Hirata3, Hisateru Komatsu1, Ryutaro Uchi3, Teppei Shimamura2, Yusuke Takahashi1, Junji Kurashige3, Tae Matsumura1, Hiroki Ueo3, Yuki Takano3, Masami Ueda1, Shotaro Sakimura3, Yoshiaki Shinden3, Hidetoshi Eguchi3, Tomoya Sudo3, Keishi Sugimachi3, Makoto Yamasaki4, Fumiaki Tanaka3, Yuji Tachimori5, Yoshiaki Kajiyama6, Shoji Natsugoe7, Hiromasa Fujita8, Yoichi Tanaka9, George Calin10, Satoru Miyano2, Yuichiro Doki4, Masaki Mori4, Koshi Mimori3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few driver genes have been well established in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Identification of the genomic aberrations that contribute to changes in gene expression profiles can be used to predict driver genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26465158 PMCID: PMC4605796 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Integrative analysis and candidate genes.
(a) Schema of the analysis flow in this study. (b) Plots of recurring high-level amplifications and deletions in 62 ESCCs from GISTIC analysis. The X-axis shows the G score (top) and false discovery rate (q value; bottom) for recurrent peaks across the genome, with the green line indicating an arbitrary false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff of 0.25. Labels on the right denote the positions of peaks in significantly altered regions. (c) Results of integrative analysis and G scores obtained from GISTIC analysis in chromosome 17. The y-axis on left side represents the G score, while the y-axis on the right side represents the p-value from Wilcoxon tests using the edira algorithm. The G score of the positive value indicates amplification, while that of the negative value indicates deletion. The red and blue lines show G scores of amplifications and deletions, respectively. The dotted red line indicates the threshold of amplification, and the dotted blue line indicates the threshold of deletion. Dot plots indicate p-values from Wilcoxon tests in each position. Dot plots in light blue represent deletions, and dot plots in orange represent amplifications. The regions in yellow indicate significant correlations between expression and copy number alterations. (d) Forest plot of hazard ratios of candidate genes for survival. The table on the left side of the Forest plot shows the p-value from univariate and multivariate survival analysis for each gene.
GISTIC-defined peaks associated with altered expression in ESCC.
| Cytoband | Q value | Wide peak boundaries | Direction of aberration | Frequency of aberration (%) | Significance in GSE17958 | Genes in peak | Candidate targets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11q13.2 | 1.58E-20 | chr11:69034285–69149286 | amplification | 80.6 | significant | 1 | CCND1 | ||
| 8p11.23 | 6.02E-17 | chr8:39356625–39535683 | amplification | 90.3 | 1 | ||||
| 7p11.2 | 1.65E-07 | chr7:54816792–55162089 | amplification | 61.3 | significant | 1 | EGFR | ||
| 3q26.33 | 0.00098284 | chr3:182878001–183294550 | amplification | 85.5 | significant | 1 | SOX2 | ||
| 3q13.2 | 0.023964 | chr3:113499996–114212594 | amplification | 67.7 | 9 | CD200 | ATG3 | ||
| 17q12 | 0.031192 | chr17:35017165–35202671 | amplification | 58.0 | significant | 10 | ERBB2 | GRB7 | |
| 18q22.1 | 1.90E-06 | chr18:45971551–76117153 | deletion | 71.0 | 93 | BCL2 | SMAD4 | NFATC1 | |
| 3p14.2 | 0.00073274 | chr3:59007938–61527556 | deletion | 93.5 | significant | 1 | FHIT | ||
| 3p24.1 | 0.0031654 | chr3:30021139–31677792 | deletion | 91.9 | 3 | TGFBR2 | |||
| 3p14.1 | 0.040761 | chr3:70098576–71732543 | deletion | 91.9 | 1 | FOXP1 | |||
Q value indicated the significance of copy number alteration in each region.
The % aberration included any gain over 0.1 or loss under −0.1 (log2 ratio).
Candidate targets were genes that have actual correlations between expression and copy number alterations in 'genes in peak'.
Results of analysis on RNA interference screening data of Project Achilles.
| Gene | Locus | P value | Q value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog | 21q22.2 | 3.44E-07 | 0.0054 |
|
| Growth factor receptor-bound protein 7 | 17q12 | 1.69E-05 | 0.084 |
|
| Hepatic leukemia factor | 17q22 | 2.10E-05 | 0.0927 |
Fig 2Knockdown of GRB7 expression in ESCC cell lines.
(a) Reductions in mRNA and protein levels of GRB7 at 48 hours after siRNA transfection in KYSE410 and TE4 cells. The results are the mean ± SD from 3 replicates of a single experiment. (b) GRB7 inactivation reduced proliferation of KYSE410 and TE4 cells. Cell growth was measured on days 2, 3, and 4 by MTT assay. Absorbance at day 0 was assigned a value of 1. The results are the mean ± SD from 6 replicates of a single experiment. (c) Migration and invasion assays using GRB7-knockdown cells. Each bar represents the average of 3 measurements. (d) Inhibitory effects of siRNA targeting GRB7 in combination with trastuzumab. Cells were transfected with siRNA targeting GRB7 or negative control siRNA and treated with or without trastuzumab (0.1 and 1.0 μg/mL). Cells were then seeded in 96-well plates, and cell growth was monitored every 24 hours using MTT assays. Absorbance at day 0 was assigned a value of 1. The results are the mean ± SD from 6 replicates of a single experiment.
Fig 3Clinical significance of GRB7 mRNA expression in ESCC is validated in the validation set.
(a) Analysis of GRB7 mRNA expression in tumor tissues and the corresponding normal mucosa by real-time RT-PCR. (b) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for ESCC patients according to GRB7 mRNA expression.
Results of univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathlogical factors for 5-year overall survival in the validation set.
| Factors (number of patients) | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI low | 95% CI high | P value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI low | 95% CI high | P value | |
| Age (70< / ≥70: n = 59 / 26) | 1.17 | 0.59 | 2.33 | 0.65 | - | - | - | - |
| Depth (T1 / T2-T4: n = 9 / 76) | 3.07 | 0.73 | 12.96 | 0.13 | - | - | - | - |
| Venous invasion (Negative / Positive: n = 10 / 75) | - | 0.00 | - | 1.00 | - | - | - | - |
| Histology (well / mod&poor: n = 30 / 55) | 2.32 | 1.04 | 5.19 | 0.04 | 1.43 | 0.58 | 3.52 | 0.44 |
| Lymph node metastasis (Negative / Positive: n = 23 / 62) | 3.55 | 1.34 | 9.40 | 0.01 | 2.23 | 0.71 | 6.96 | 0.17 |
|
| 2.54 | 1.28 | 5.05 | 0.01 | 1.91 | 0.92 | 3.96 | 0.08 |
CI: confidence interval, well: well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, mod: moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, poor: poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.