Literature DB >> 26465036

Disentangling the effects of climate, density dependence, and harvest on an iconic large herbivore's population dynamics.

David N Koons, Fernando Colchero, Kent Hersey, Olivier Gimenez.   

Abstract

Understanding the relative effects of climate, harvest, and density dependence on population dynamics is critical for guiding sound population management, especially for ungulates in arid and semiarid environments experiencing climate change. To address these issues for bison in southern Utah, USA, we applied a Bayesian state-space model to a 72-yr time series of abundance counts. While accounting for known harvest (as well as live removal) from the population, we found that the bison population in southern Utah exhibited a strong potential to grow from low density (β0 = 0.26; Bayesian credible interval based on 95% of the highest posterior density [BCI] = 0.19-0.33), and weak but statistically significant density dependence (β1 = -0.02, BCI = -0.04 to -0.004). Early spring temperatures also had strong positive effects on population growth (Pfat1 = 0.09, BCI = 0.04-0.14), much more so than precipitation and other temperature-related variables (model weight > three times more than that for other climate variables). Although we hypothesized that harvest is the primary driving force of bison population dynamics in southern Utah, our elasticity analysis indicated that changes in early spring temperature could have a greater relative effect on equilibrium abundance than either harvest or. the strength of density dependence. Our findings highlight the utility of incorporating elasticity analyses into state-space population models, and the need to include climatic processes in wildlife management policies and planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26465036     DOI: 10.1890/14-0932.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Ecological forecasts reveal limitations of common model selection methods: predicting changes in beaver colony densities.

Authors:  Sean M Johnson-Bice; Jake M Ferguson; John D Erb; Thomas D Gable; Steve K Windels
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species.

Authors:  Mathieu Chevalier; Pablo Tedesco; Gael Grenouillet
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Effects of climate variability on the demography of wild geladas.

Authors:  Evan T Sloan; Jacinta C Beehner; Thore J Bergman; Amy Lu; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Maternal carryover, winter severity, and brown bear abundance relate to elk demographics.

Authors:  Sarah L Schooler; Nathan J Svoboda; Shannon P Finnegan; John Crye; Kenneth F Kellner; Jerrold L Belant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Harvest and density-dependent predation drive long-term population decline in a northern ungulate.

Authors:  Robby R Marrotte; Brent R Patterson; Joseph M Northrup
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.