Literature DB >> 26464288

Effect of coil packing proximal to the dilated segment on postoperative medullary infarction and prognosis following internal trapping for ruptured vertebral artery dissection.

Hiroyuki Ikeda1, Hirotoshi Imamura2, Yohei Mineharu3, Shoichi Tani2, Hidemitsu Adachi2, Chiaki Sakai4, Tatsuya Ishikawa2, Katsunori Asai3, Nobuyuki Sakai3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medullary infarction is an important complication of internal trapping for vertebral artery dissection. This study investigated risk factors for medullary infarction following internal trapping of ruptured vertebral artery dissection.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 26 patients with ruptured vertebral artery dissection who underwent endovascular treatment and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging between April 2001 and March 2013. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed to identify factors associated with postoperative medullary infarction.
RESULTS: Ten of the 26 patients (38%) showed postoperative lateral medullary infarction on magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that medullary infarction was independently associated with poor clinical outcome (odds ratio (OR) 17.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68-436.81; p=0.032). Univariate analysis identified vertebral artery dissection on the right side and longer length of the entire trapped area as risk factors for postoperative medullary infarction. When the trapped area was divided into three segments (dilated, distal, and proximal segments), proximal segment length, but not dilated segment length, was significantly associated with medullary infarction (OR 1.55 for a 1-mm increase in proximal segment length; 95% CI 1.15-2.63; p=0.027). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that proximal segment length offered a good predictor of the risk of postoperative medullary infarction, with a cut-off value of 5.8 mm (sensitivity 100%; specificity 82.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Longer length of the trapped area, specifically the segment proximal to the dilated portion, is associated with a higher incidence of medullary infarction following internal trapping, indicating that this complication may be avoidable.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vertebral artery dissection; internal trapping; medullary infarction; subarachnoid hemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26464288      PMCID: PMC4757381          DOI: 10.1177/1591019915609127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  36 in total

1.  Microvascular anatomy of foramen caecum medullae oblongatae.

Authors:  A Mahmood; M Dujovny; M Torche; L Dragovic; J I Ausman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment.

Authors:  J R Cebral; F Mut; M Raschi; E Scrivano; R Ceratto; P Lylyk; C M Putman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment.

Authors:  Z Kulcsár; E Houdart; A Bonafé; G Parker; J Millar; A J P Goddard; S Renowden; G Gál; B Turowski; K Mitchell; F Gray; M Rodriguez; R van den Berg; A Gruber; H Desal; I Wanke; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Reconstructive endovascular treatment of a ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm using the Pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  Andrew F Ducruet; R Webster Crowley; Felipe C Albuquerque; Cameron G McDougall
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection.

Authors:  Hidenori Endo; Yasushi Matsumoto; Ryushi Kondo; Kenichi Sato; Miki Fujimura; Takashi Inoue; Hiroaki Shimizu; Akira Takahashi; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical characteristics and outcomes in conservatively treated patients.

Authors:  Masaru Yamada; Takao Kitahara; Akira Kurata; Kiyotaka Fujii; Yoshio Miyasaka
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intradural vertebral dissecting aneurysms.

Authors:  J P P Peluso; W J van Rooij; M Sluzewski; G N Beute; C B Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Lateral and medial medullary infarction: a comparative analysis of 214 patients.

Authors:  W Kameda; T Kawanami; K Kurita; M Daimon; T Kayama; T Hosoya; T Kato
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Failure of stent-assisted endovascular treatment for ruptured dissecting aneurysms of the basilar artery.

Authors:  Y Kaku; S Yoshimura; H Yamakawa; N Sakai
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Mechanism of medullary infarction based on arterial territory involvement.

Authors:  Kyoungsub Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Yo Han Jung; Young Dae Kim; Hyo Suk Nam; Chung Mo Nam; Seung Min Kim; Ji Hoe Heo
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.077

View more
  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of high-resolution cone-beam CT in the evaluation of perforators in vertebral artery dissection.

Authors:  Kenji Shimada; Michihiro Tanaka; Keisuke Kadooka; Hiromu Hadeishi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Overlapping stent-assisted coil embolization for a ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection.

Authors:  Katsunori Asai; Hajime Nakamura; Takeo Nishida; Shayne Morris; Takayuki Sakaki
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 3.  Therapeutic Progress in Treating Vertebral Dissecting Aneurysms Involving the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Kan Xu; Xiaofeng Sun; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.