Literature DB >> 26463618

About the composition of self-relevance: Conjunctions not features are bound to the self.

Sarah Schäfer1, Christian Frings2, Dirk Wentura3.   

Abstract

Sui and colleagues (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105-1117, 2012) introduced a matching paradigm to investigate prioritized processing of instructed self-relevance. They arbitrarily assigned simple geometric shapes to the participant and two other persons. Subsequently, the task was to judge whether label-shape pairings matched or not. The authors found a remarkable self-prioritization effect, that is, for matching self-related trials verification was very fast and accurate in comparison to the non-matching conditions. We analyzed whether single features or feature conjunctions are tagged to the self. In particular, we assigned colored shapes to the labels and included partial-matching trials (i.e., trials in which only one feature matched the label, whereas the other feature did not match the label). If single features are tagged to the self, partial matches would result in interference, whereas they should elicit the same data pattern as non-matching trials if only feature conjunctions are tagged to the self. Our data suggest the latter; only feature conjunctions are tagged to the self and are processed in a prioritized manner. This result emphasizes the functionality of self-relevance as a selection mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding; Feature conjunction; Selective attention; Self

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26463618     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0953-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Instruction-induced feature binding.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-10

3.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.

Authors:  Jerzy Jarmasz; Justin G Hollands
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2009-06

4.  In-group modulation of perceptual matching.

Authors:  Zargol Moradi; Jie Sui; Miles Hewstone; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

5.  Self-Prioritization Beyond Perception.

Authors:  Sarah Schäfer; Dirk Wentura; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2015

6.  Extended self: medial prefrontal activity during transient association of self and objects.

Authors:  Kyungmi Kim; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Xun He; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Stimulus-response bindings in priming.

Authors:  Richard N Henson; Doris Eckstein; Florian Waszak; Christian Frings; Aidan J Horner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Saliency at first sight: instant identity referential advantage toward a newly met partner.

Authors:  Miao Cheng; Chia-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 2.  Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory.

Authors:  Siobhan Caughey; Johanna K Falbén; Dimitra Tsamadi; Linn M Persson; Marius Golubickis; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-09

3.  Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.

Authors:  Clea Desebrock; Charles Spence; Ayla Barutchu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Authors:  Saga L Svensson; Marius Golubickis; Hollie Maclean; Johanna K Falbén; Linn M Persson; Dimitra Tsamadi; Siobhan Caughey; Arash Sahraie; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-29

5.  It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.

Authors:  Johanna K Falbén; Marius Golubickis; Darja Wischerath; Dimitra Tsamadi; Linn M Persson; Siobhan Caughey; Saga L Svensson; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.