Literature DB >> 26462989

Antibiofilm agents against MDR bacterial strains: is bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 also effective?

Monica Bortolin1, Elena De Vecchi1, Carlo Luca Romanò2, Marco Toscano1, Roberto Mattina3, Lorenzo Drago4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The treatment of bone and joint infections is challenging due to the presence of bacterial biofilm and the increasing emergence of multiresistant strains. BAG-S53P4 is a bone substitute that is characterized by osteoconductive and antimicrobial properties. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of BAG-S53P4 against biofilm produced in vitro by multiresistant bacterial strains.
METHODS: Multiresistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from bone and joint infections were used in this study. Titanium discs covered by bacterial biofilm were incubated with BAG-S53P4 or inert glass as a control. The amount of biofilm on each titanium disc was evaluated after 48 h of incubation by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy.
RESULTS: Significantly lower total biomass volumes were observed for all strains after treatment with BAG-S53P4 when compared with controls. Moreover, the percentage of dead cells was significantly higher in treated samples than in controls for all the tested strains.
CONCLUSIONS: BAG-S53P4 is able to reduce the biofilm produced by multiresistant S. epidermidis, A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae on titanium substrates in vitro, probably by interfering with cell viability. Owing to its osteoconductive, antibacterial and antibiofilm properties, the use of BAG-S53P4 may be a successful strategy for the treatment of bone and prosthetic joint infections.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26462989     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  11 in total

Review 1.  Recent Evidence on Bioactive Glass Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Drago; Marco Toscano; Marta Bottagisio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of bioactive glass (S53P4) in the treatment of non-unions of the tibia and femur: study protocol of a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Michael C Tanner; Raban Heller; Fabian Westhauser; Matthias Miska; Thomas Ferbert; Christian Fischer; Simone Gantz; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Patrick Haubruck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Impact of Citral and Phloretin, Alone and in Combination, on Major Virulence Traits of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  Mohd Adil; Mohd Hassan Baig; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Saving the lower limb with GlassBONE™ - Successful surgical revision of pseudarthrosis after infected open proximal tibia fracture type IIIC with bioactive glass grafting - A case report.

Authors:  L Tetzel; M Guyard
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-13

5.  Chromone Derivatives CM3a Potently Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms by Inhibiting Cell Adherence.

Authors:  Qing Zhan; Yanlei Xu; Lingling Zhan; Bingjie Wang; Yinjuan Guo; Xiaocui Wu; Wenxiu Ai; Zengqiang Song; Fangyou Yu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Broad virus inactivation using inorganic micro/nano-particulate materials.

Authors:  Sergio Rius-Rocabert; Javier Arranz-Herrero; Adolfo Fernández-Valdés; Marzia Marciello; Sandra Moreno; Francisco Llinares-Pinel; Jesus Presa; Rubén Hernandez-Alcoceba; Roberto López-Píriz; Ramón Torrecillas; Antonia García; Alejandro Brun; Marco Filice; José S Moya; Belen Cabal; Estanislao Nistal-Villan
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2021-12-22

7.  Treatment of Infection-Related Non-Unions with Bioactive Glass-A Promising Approach or Just Another Method of Dead Space Management?

Authors:  Holger Freischmidt; Jonas Armbruster; Catharina Rothhaas; Nadine Titze; Thorsten Guehring; Dennis Nurjadi; Robert Sonntag; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Paul Alfred Grützner; Lars Helbig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  In vitro antibacterial activity of bioactive glass S53P4 on multiresistant pathogens causing osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Mateus Trinconi Cunha; Maria Aparecida Murça; Stanley Nigro; Giselle Burlamaqui Klautau; Mauro José Costa Salles
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 9.  Bioactive Glass Applications in Dentistry.

Authors:  Hans Erling Skallevold; Dinesh Rokaya; Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Sohail Zafar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Use of contemporary biomaterials in chronic osteomyelitis treatment: Clinical lessons learned and literature review.

Authors:  Jan A P Geurts; Tom A G van Vugt; Jacobus J C Arts
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.