| Literature DB >> 26462700 |
Jian Chen1, Nikolaos Dagres2, Melece Hocini3, Laurent Fauchier4, Maria Grazia Bongiorni5, Pascal Defaye6, Antonio Hernandez-Madrid7, Heidi Estner8, Elena Sciaraffia9, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist9.
Abstract
The European Snapshot Survey on Procedural Routines in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation (ESS-PRAFA) is a prospective, multicentre snapshot survey collecting patient-based data on current clinical practices during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The participating centres were asked to prospectively enrol consecutive patients during a 6-week period (from September to October 2014). A web-based case report form was employed to collect information of patients and data of procedures. A total of 455 eligible consecutive patients from 13 countries were enrolled (mean age 59 ± 10.8 years, 28.8% women). Distinct strategies and endpoints were collected for AF ablation procedures. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 96.7% and served as the endpoint in 91.3% of procedures. A total of 52 (11.5%) patients underwent ablation as first-line therapy. The cryoballoon technique was employed in 31.4% of procedures. Procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopy times differed among various types of AF ablation. Divergences in patient selection and complications were observed among low-, medium-, and high-volume centres. Adverse events were observed in 4.6% of AF ablation procedures. In conclusion, PVI was still the main strategy for AF ablation. Procedure-related complications seemed not to have declined. The centre volume played an important role in patient selection, strategy choice, and had impact on the rate of periprocedural complication. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Complication; Cryoballoon; Endpoint; Irrigated radiofrequency catheter; Strategy; Survey
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26462700 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214