Literature DB >> 26462165

A Survey of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Regarding Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, and Organization.

John L Ard1, Katherine Tobin, Tessa Huncke, Richard Kline, Susan M Ryan, Charlotte Bell.   

Abstract

Our planet is in the midst of an environmental crisis. Government and international agencies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change urge radical and transformative change at every level of how we conduct our personal and professional lives. The health care industry contributes to climate change. According to a study from the University of Chicago, the health care sector accounts for 8% of the United States' total greenhouse gas emissions. In an effort to understand the current state of environmental practice, attitudes, and knowledge among anesthesiologists in the United States, we conducted a survey of American anesthesiologists regarding environmental sustainability. The environmental survey was sent out by e-mail to a random sampling of 5200 members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. This process was repeated a second time. A total of 2189 anesthesiologists of 5200 responded to the survey, a 42% response rate. Of the survey respondents, 80.1% (confidence interval, 78.2%-81.9%) were interested in recycling. Respondents reported recycling in 27.7% of operating rooms where they work. The majority of respondents (67%; confidence interval, 64%-69%) reported there was insufficient information on how to recycle intraoperatively. Respondents supported sustainability practices such as reprocessing equipment, using prefilled syringes, and donating unused equipment and supplies. The affirmative response rate was 48.4% for reprocessing equipment, 56.6% for using prefilled syringes, and 65.1% for donating equipment and supplies to medical missions. Questions about hospital-wide organization of sustainability programs elicited many "I don't know" responses. Eighteen percent of responders indicated the presence of a sustainability or "green" task force. A total of 12.6% of responders indicated the presence of a mandate from hospital leadership to promote sustainability programs. Two important conclusions drawn from the survey data are a lack of hospital-wide organization of sustainability programs and a belief among survey responders that they lack adequate information on recycling and sustainability.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26462165     DOI: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  A A Case Rep        ISSN: 2325-7237


  5 in total

1.  Athletic Trainers' Attitudes and Perceptions of Environmental Sustainability.

Authors:  Kelly Potteiger; William A Pitney; Thomas A Cappaert; Angela Wolfe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  The Triple Bottom Line and Stabilization Wedges: A Framework for Perioperative Sustainability.

Authors:  Bong Joon James Choi; Catherine L Chen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Medical, nursing, and physician assistant student knowledge and attitudes toward climate change, pollution, and resource conservation in health care.

Authors:  Emma C Ryan; Robert Dubrow; Jodi D Sherman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Medicines, environment and clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Outi Lapatto-Reiniluoto; Mia Siven; Janne T Backman; Anneli Törrönen
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 5.  Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Forbes McGain; Jane Muret; Cathy Lawson; Jodi D Sherman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.