Literature DB >> 26461255

Transoral robotic surgery vs. radiotherapy for management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - A systematic review of the literature.

D H Yeh1, S Tam1, K Fung2, S D MacNeil2, J Yoo2, E Winquist3, D A Palma4, A C Nichols2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy is widely utilized for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, due to significant acute and late toxicities there has been increasing interest in minimally invasive surgical approaches, particularly transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in an attempt to preserve patient quality of life while maintaining oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the current literature in order to compare primary IMRT versus TORS in the management of OPSCC.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the outcomes of TORS or IMRT in the treatment of OPSCC. Reference lists were also reviewed for relevant articles. Oncologic, functional, and quality of life data is summarized and discussed.
RESULTS: One hundred-ninety papers were identified through the MEDLINE search. An additional 52 papers were retrieved by hand searching the reference lists. Ultimately, 44 papers were identified that discussed outcomes after IMRT or TORS for OPSCC. No outcomes from randomized trials were identified.
CONCLUSION: No randomized trials comparing TORS versus IMRT to each other were identified. Uncontrolled reports from the current literature suggest comparable oncologic outcomes with TORS compared to IMRT and functional outcomes may be superior. However, the median follow-up was relatively short and the TORS studies included patients with earlier stage OPSCC on average compared to IMRT studies. Prospective, randomized controlled trials and direct, well-matched comparisons are needed to further elucidate the role for TORS in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; Radiotherapy; Robotic surgery; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26461255     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  26 in total

1.  Development of an online, patient-centred decision aid for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the transoral robotic surgery era.

Authors:  J S Lam; G M Scott; D A Palma; K Fung; A V Louie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Treatment preferences in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Melina J Windon; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  [Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery for primary treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: randomisation decides].

Authors:  Alexander Fabian; David Krug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Robotics in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Veejay Bagga; Dev Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Commercial Claims-Based Comparison of Survival and Toxic Effects of Definitive Radiotherapy vs Primary Surgery in Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  David J Sher; Abiy Agiro; Siting Zhou; Andrew T Day; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Lateral pharyngotomy approach in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Andy Bertolin; Guido Ghirardo; Marco Lionello; Luciano Giacomelli; Marco Lucioni; Giuseppe Rizzotto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Primary transoral robotic surgery with concurrent neck dissection for early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma implemented at a Danish head and neck cancer center: a phase II trial on feasibility and tumour margin status.

Authors:  Niclas Rubek; Hani Ibrahim Channir; Birgitte Wittenborg Charabi; Christel Bræmer Lajer; Katalin Kiss; Hans Ulrik Nielsen; Jens Bentzen; Jeppe Friborg; Christian von Buchwald
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si.

Authors:  Marco Alessandrini; Isabella Pavone; Alessandro Micarelli; Claudio Caporale
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-13

Review 9.  Transoral robotic surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armando De Virgilio; Andrea Costantino; Giuseppe Mercante; Raul Pellini; Fabio Ferreli; Luca Malvezzi; Giovanni Colombo; Giovanni Cugini; Gerardo Petruzzi; Giuseppe Spriano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony T Nguyen; Michael Luu; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Diana J Lu; Stephen L Shiao; Allen S Ho; Zachary S Zumsteg
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.